Untitled - public proposal #17

canceling, will recreate on OpenGov

This is a democracy proposal to open a bi-directional HRMP channel between Statemint and [Composable](https://www.composable.finance/). Posted as a discussion [here](https://polkadot.subsquare.io/post/21). Composable's parachain ID is 2019 which is used in HRMP calls for channel opening.

This channel will be used to obtain native stablecoins in the Composable ecosystem.

The batch_all contains:

A force_transfer of 20 DOT from the Treasury to Statemint sovereign account.
A force_open_hrmp_channel from Composable to Statemint.
A force_open_hrmp_channel from Statemint to Composable.

- A proposal has been made for Statemint and Composable to open a channel to exchange stablecoins.
- Composable has a unique ID (2019) that will be used to make this exchange possible.
- The proposal includes a transfer of 20 DOT from the Treasury to Statemint's account.
- Both Statemint and Composable will open HRMP channels to facilitate the exchange.
- This exchange will allow for the use of stablecoins within the Composable ecosystem.

HRMP Channel Opening: Composable <> Statemint

# Context
Over the past few months, there have been numerous discussions surrounding treasury spending, particularly concerning the return on investment (ROI) and the value generated from these expenditures. We recognize that these metrics can sometimes be subjective. However, we have identified a specific treasury allocation that was granted, marked as lost, and subsequently re-awarded by the Polkadot Council. 

# Initial Treasury Request
For clarity, this discussion is not related to the content of the proposal or the team receiving DOT but is solely focused on the funds marked as ["lost”](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/motion/152#d5254fb0-f5b5-48c3-a045-2c0e1b88da5a).

In February 2022, the Supercolony team requested 6,011 DOT ($128,000) to host an online event dedicated to Polkadot smart contracts called the "WASM Conference." You can find the Council Motion and treasury proposal [here](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/motion/152).

It is worth noting that the majority of the Supercolony team are from Ukraine, and in March 2022, the Russian invasion of Ukraine took place. Understandably, the Supercolony team had to leave their home country.

This situation led to treasury proposal 96, which can be viewed [here](https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/proposal/96). The team stated that they lost access to the funds while leaving Ukraine. They then established a new account identity and were awarded an additional 6,011 DOT to host the WASM Conference.

# Current Situation
An account containing approximately 6,000 DOT, awarded by the treasury and marked as "lost," now exists. You can see the account [here](https://polkadot.subscan.io/account/5HTb4Sr2kLAhhELhqGTsgvMb2xE1ByaSk4xbY8rwLF8XRuau?tab=transfer).

The Polkadot Council, and by extension our ecosystem's treasury, has paid twice for the same project (WASM Conference).

The team was re-awarded the necessary amount due to the political situation in Ukraine. The funds were allocated specifically for completing tasks outlined in their proposal and were granted twice.

ChaosDAO strongly believes that it is inappropriate to allow these DOTs to remain in this account as the team were reissued the original allocation of tokens subsequent to the first payment being lost.

Due to the factors above, we are proposing the following extrinsic be initiated:

* balances.ForceTransfer

This extrinsic will transfer 6,011 DOT from the lost Supercolony account to the Polkadot treasury.

We would like to remind the community that each referendum is unique and discrete in its scope, and every individual referendum should be evaluated on its own merits prior to voting. There should not be any precedent set by approving the aforementioned extrinsic. This should never be used as a basis for approving future uses of the balances.ForceTransfer extrinsic haphazardly. 

Ultimately, we believe that the fate of these lost funds should be decided upon by the DOT token holder DAO, as they belong to the treasury. Whether the outcome of the decision is AYE or NAY, we believe that it is of the utmost importance that this decision be decided by the collective token holders, and not retroactively by the council with no community input.

To reiterate, this discussion is not about the Supercolony team or any specific individual; it is solely focused on addressing accounts claimed to be "lost" that have received treasury rewards.



- There was a request for 6,011 DOT ($128,000) to host an online event called the "WASM Conference."
- The Supercolony team lost access to the funds while leaving Ukraine due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
- The team established a new account identity and was awarded an additional 6,011 DOT to host the WASM Conference.
- The Polkadot Council paid twice for the same project (WASM Conference).
- ChaosDAO is proposing to transfer 6,011 DOT from the lost Supercolony account to the Polkadot treasury.

Returning Supercolony lost funds back to the Treasury

This proposal was enacted via

https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referendum/113

This is no longer needed, please reject





[Please Reject] Superseded by referendum 113

As all but one of the council [chose to abstain](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/motion/373) from voting to pass this proposal to a community vote - I'm now submitting this through democracy for the community to decide whether this proposal should be voted on by the community.

Some of you might feel this proposal reaches outside of the normal scope the treasury - I would argue that, given this technology's stated aim to be decentralised and unstoppable, this is an existential question the community should decide.
 
I would ask people to read the proposal and consider the impact voting for it would have for both`Polkadot and the people affected by this disaster. 


**Proponent: Simon Hipkins (Key Pictures)
 Beneficiary: Ihtiyac haritası (NeedsMap.coop) 1haY6iHgLopw2WWmPhcdCy2jwzL2jthbNL515rUyJtnmhUt
 Date: 20.03.2023
 Requested DOT: 171333.51 (USD $1,081,000.00) Converted to DOT using the EMA7 rate on subscan on date of submission (20/03/2023)**

**Summary:**
 On February 6th, 2023, two earthquakes hit Pazarcik and Elbistan in Kahramanmaras, Turkey, leading to over 50,000 deaths and leaving 1.5 million people homeless. This was the deadliest earthquake worldwide since the 2010 Haiti earthquake. 

It is also proving to be one of the first major examples of blockchains and their tokens being used to directly offer humanitarian assistance. 
 So far over $12.5 million in donations have been made from blockchain protocols, treasuries, exchanges and donors.

**This proposal provides a tangible and transparent way for the Polkadot community to contribute to a long-term and a UNDP approved best practice project that will help people recover from this terrible disaster.**

Ihtiyacharitası (NeedsMap.coop) is one of Turkey's most reliable non-governmental organizations and has been at the forefront of search and rescue efforts in recent weeks. As UNDP co-lead for reconstruction efforts in the region they are now beginning to construct a series of villages built from repurposed shipping containers across the affected region. These villages will provide much needed housing, social and psychological care for those affected by the earthquake. They will also be a best practice model for other UN affiliated organizations and contractors building hundreds of such container villages across the region. 

 This proposal would allow the Polkadot community to build a neighbourhood in one of these villages. This neighbourhood would consist of around 100 containers (households) and house approximately 400 - 450 people over an area of 6900m2.

As it is usual for such temporary post-earthquake housing to be necessary for at least two years - this proposal also budgets to support the maintenance and social program for this neighbourhood for 24 months.

**In effect we will be using DOT to give a two-year lifeline to hundreds of people to rebuild their lives and helping to define a best practice model for post-disaster housing.**

Please read the full proposal and budget [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/102KiQRMjDSemj8eSNCYJe8VSwOc_aMbqBU6mXbjJbms/edit?usp=sharing).

And you can [listen to an interview](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M7oAbRKsvYmue2qJs7j_GFVOqWzXkZdx/view?usp=sharing) I made with [Esra Arslan](https://www.linkedin.com/in/esra-arslan-63088314/), co-founder of the beneficiary organisation NeedsMap and project lead for the container village in Hatay. During the interview I was able to ask her many of the questions raised over the last weeks.

And you can view images of the current construction work [here](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18JkK3xWBmTYEN5DSSEg0eabyP_gfS-i0?usp=sharing). 

> 
**Beneficiary Identity**

The DOT Account of the Beneficiary, ‘Ihtiyaç haritası’ (NeedsMap) has been approved by ‘MASAK’ (The Turkish Financial Regulator). As part of the Turkish government regulations, NeedsMap (along with all NGOs in Turkey) were mandated to set-up their wallet addresses on Turkish exchanges, Paribu and BTCTurk. The ‘Ihtiyaç haritası’ (NeedsMap) wallet address has been opened on the local Turkish crypto-exchange, Paribu. 

As the NeedsMap wallet address is on an exchange it is not possible for them to create an on-chain identity for the beneficiary account. In lieu of this on-chain identity, NeedsMap has publicly tweeted out the beneficiary address in the proposal - available to see here:

[https://twitter.com/ihtiyacharitasi/status/1632116990390288391?s=20](https://twitter.com/ihtiyacharitasi/status/1632116990390288391?s=20)

This DOT address - can be verified to be the same on Paribu - the Turkish exchange - webpage here:

[https://www.paribu.com/blog/en/news/about-our-disaster-support-plan-and-the-cryptocurrency-donation-system/](https://www.paribu.com/blog/en/news/about-our-disaster-support-plan-and-the-cryptocurrency-donation-system/)

If this proposal is successful, Paribu will hold NeedsMap’s DOT in account and convert it into Turkish Lira gradually so as not to affect the market value. 

In accordance with the Turkish Regulator’s requirements, for every request NeedsMap makes for funds from their account at Paribu - they must supply an invoice - e.g. for the purchase of 100 containers. All these invoices will be made available to the DOT community as part of the reporting process on the project (see milestones) to ensure full transparency that the DOT contributed is being used to pay for the project.

All of NeedsMap’s transactions regarding support they receive are audited on a daily basis by Mazars, an independent audit, tax and accounting company. In addition, every spend from their DOT beneficiary address will be invoiced for, and these invoices will be made available to the Polkadot community in 3 milestone reports over the duration of the project.

- In Turkey, two earthquakes hit Pazarcik and Elbistan on February 6th, 2023, causing over 50,000 deaths and leaving 1.5 million people homeless.
- A non-governmental organization called Ihtiyac haritası (NeedsMap.coop) is constructing a series of villages built from repurposed shipping containers across the affected region to provide much-needed housing, social and psychological care for those affected by the earthquake.
- This proposal aims to allow the Polkadot community to build a neighborhood in one of these villages, consisting of around 100 containers and housing approximately 400-450 people over an area of 6900m2.
- The proposal budgets to support the maintenance and social program for this neighborhood for 24 months, providing a two-year lifeline to hundreds of people to rebuild their lives and helping to define a best practice model for post-disaster housing.
- The DOT account of the beneficiary, NeedsMap, has been approved by the Turkish Financial Regulator, and if this proposal is successful, Paribu will hold NeedsMap's DOT in account and convert it into Turkish Lira gradually so as not to affect the market value.

Polkadot Spending Proposal: DOT Housing for those affected by the Turkish-Syria Earthquake

****What Happened****

Our parathread was registered on the Polkadot relaychain, obtained a parachain slot and was upgraded to a parachain. However, we encountered a minor setback when the genesis collators failed to produce blocks on the new chain. It turns out that the registration process contained incompatible genesis WASM and state files, which caused our parachain to be stuck at genesis.

****Remedy****

After thorough investigation and collaboration with the Parity development team, we've identified an solution to the issue. With assistance from Polkadot governance, we can correct the incompatible parachain state & WASM files that were originally registered. This correction will not have any impact or loss of state since the chain has never produced any blocks. We believe that this is the most efficient and effective solution to get our parachain up and running.

Extrinsics called in this proposal:
- batchAll()
    - paras::forceSetCurrentCode(2104, corrected.wasm)
    - registrar::setCurrentHead(2104, corrected.state)

- A team tried to register their parathread on Polkadot but faced a problem when the chain didn't produce blocks.
- The problem was caused by incompatible files during the registration process.
- The team worked with the Parity development team to find a solution.
- The solution involves correcting the incompatible files with the help of Polkadot governance.
- The correction will not cause any loss of state and will allow the parachain to start producing blocks.

Fix genesis registration for Manta Parachain

Hello everyone!
I'm an active Polkadot ecosystem user who believes in its future!

I am pleased that the system provides the ability to return funds that were mistakenly transferred.

2022-05-11 17:28:30 I accidentally [sent](https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/0xbbc0738087df6875137fd8aed2e533b243dc660a1b428b97e79174d37226fed6) 254.1591507553 DOT to the address 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000(null). In fact, from the extrinsic [event](https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/10261275-2?event=10261275-14), I observed that these DOT were sent to the 13YMK2eYoAvStnzReuxBjMrAvPXmmdsURwZvc62PrdXimbNy address, so I believe that community may help me and transfer back my DOT. **I admit that this is my mistake but I hope for community understanding.** Thank you in advance!

Extrinsic: https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/0xbbc0738087df6875137fd8aed2e533b243dc660a1b428b97e79174d37226fed6
Sent from: 13b9d23v1Hke7pcVk8G4gh3TBckDtrwFZUnqPkHezq4praEY
Sent to: 13YMK2eYoAvStnzReuxBjMrAvPXmmdsURwZvc62PrdXimbNy





<ins>UPD:</ins> I also observed that these 254.1591507553 DOT were crossed out to the Acala network https://polkadot.subscan.io/xcm_message/polkadot-89bc9819c0d0315bbc0889808e05fa0529e61dfd, and tokens are actually on the https://acala.subscan.io/account/zsbavR2qukGZb3e4KoEn1fFTrRwYqJCtQYK9qS1dYwspQF3 Acala address(with only one my mistaken transfer). So probably, my proposal should be for the Acala network instead of Polkadot: to make a force XCM transfer(if it's possible) from Acala zsbavR2qukGZb3e4KoEn1fFTrRwYqJCtQYK9qS1dYwspQF3 to my Polkadot address 13b9d23v1Hke7pcVk8G4gh3TBckDtrwFZUnqPkHezq4praEY. Or probably just to send DOT from zsbavR2qukGZb3e4KoEn1fFTrRwYqJCtQYK9qS1dYwspQF3 inside the Acala network to my Acala address 23TkCwTwrCVugQf8oT4JThhheUBAShETStL9YaifdP1hfe2e (which is the same Substrate address as 13b9d23v1Hke7pcVk8G4gh3TBckDtrwFZUnqPkHezq4praEY).
I would appreciate any help!


<ins>UPD2:</ins> please delete/cancel/rollback this proposal, because:
1) I've created [a new one](https://acala.subsquare.io/democracy/proposal/22) more proper on the Acala network, because tokens are on the Acala network.
2) Token amount on this proposal is incorrect because have many ending zeros.

For a second-grade student:
- Someone accidentally sent their money to the wrong address on the Polkadot ecosystem.
- They are asking for help from the community to get their money back.
- They found out that their money was transferred to another network called Acala.
- They made a new proposal on the Acala network to get their money back.
- They asked to delete the old proposal because it had the wrong amount of money.

Cancellation: Return back DOT which were mistakenly sent to the 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 address - public proposal #25

This is a kind request to reset Zeitgeist's Parachain genesis state and wasm. More information at [https://hackmd.io/PXotv7zMTSOphZFg4f99iQ](https://hackmd.io/PXotv7zMTSOphZFg4f99iQ).

Unbrick Zeitgeist Parachain

To help make validating on Polkadot more accessible the following proposal aims to increase the maximum number of active validators per era from 297 to 500.

Currently validators require having at least ~1.663.500 DOT in nominations in order to have a chance at becoming an active validator. This has created a challenge for independent decentralized validators to get into the active set, even when getting support from the thousand validator programme. Increasing the maximum number of active validators per set should help make validating on Polkadot more open to individuals, and lower the nomination target barrier.

![](https://i.imgur.com/ymepSVw.png)
![](https://i.imgur.com/Kula6ci.png)

preimage hash: 0x8a9858782be312ee01e3c12adcbda468f8b8dc46a1e5f5cb029e0ce231ebd705
Encoded call: https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Frpc.polkadot.io#/extrinsics/decode/0x0709d107

- Polkadot is a platform where people can validate transactions.
- Currently, validators need a lot of DOT to become an active validator.
- This makes it hard for some people to become validators.
- A proposal has been made to increase the maximum number of active validators per era from 297 to 500.
- This should make it easier for more people to become validators.

Increase maximum active validator count to 500

The Bittensor project participated in Auction #36, however it was unfortunately using the incorrect para ID in its genesis WASM (para ID 2096) due to previously obtaining para ID 2096. 

We have explored all solutions to this problem and it appears that there is no way to have the chain produce blocks when its lease begins unless we update the genesis head. Therefore, we've created this proposal to update the genesis head from 2096 to 2097 using forceSetCurrentHead.

Proposal hash: 0x457da305f86a09bad84a8c557bb89628b9b39707819df0b12458d84a255d6354
Preimage is submitted.

- Bittensor project participated in an auction but used the wrong para ID in its genesis WASM.
- They tried to find solutions but couldn't produce blocks without updating the genesis head.
- They made a proposal to update the genesis head from 2096 to 2097 using forceSetCurrentHead.
- They submitted a preimage for the proposal hash.
- The outcome of the proposal is not mentioned.

Update genesis state WASM to 2097 

## Polkadot EVM Smart platform
- The EVM smart contract parachain PSC developed by the ChainX team uses DOT as the original Gas fee. 
- PSC will be integrated into the Omnichain financial platform OmniBTC to help us achieve PolkaDot's mission of universal chain interconnection.

## For a detailed description please refer to this:
https://github.com/OmniBTC/PSC/issues/1

Launch PSC Parachain - public proposal #21

Invalid

# Brief Introduction
Founded in October 2017, Liebi is a global-oriented decentralized financial service provider. The core team members are all from first-tier Internet companies such as Sina Weibo and Zhihu.

With the long-term exploration and accumulation of blockchain technology, it has launched a number of products such as Liebi pool, Liebi CPU lease and so on. Committed to providing safe, stable and nice experience of decentralized financial products for global users.

# Ways of Challenge
## Online Challenge
```
Fee: 1 KSM/Challenge
Regional: No Limit
Code Expiration: 12 Hours
```

- **Email Challenge**
    - Send a message containing `challenge code` and `identy info` to the challenged email
    - Use challenged address to sign email content, reply the signature to Registrar's email
    - Registrar using address to verify signature, verification success or failure
- **Social account riot\twitter\facebook etc. Challenge**
    - Send a message containing `challenge code` and `identy info` to the Social account by private message
    - Use challenged address to sign private message, reply the signature to Registrar's social account
    - Registrar using address to verify signature, verification success or failure

- **Website Challenge**
    - Send a message containing `challenge code` and `identy info` to the challenged email
    - Use challenged address to sign email content, choose one of the following methods
        - Place the signature in the website directory `.challenge/sign_message.txt`
        - Added `_dnsauth.domain TXT parsing content` using signature
    - Registrar using address to verify signature, verification success or failure

> Complete the above steps to get the `Reasonable` judgement

## Offline F2F(Face to Face) Challenge
```
Fee: 3-5 KSM/Challenge
Regional: Only Shanghai, China
Code Expiration: 48 Hours
```

- **Legal name Challenge**
    - Send a message containing `challenge code` and `identy info` to the challenged email
    - Use challenged address to sign email content, challenger print signature on the paper
    - The challenger show the `business license/IDs/passport` with legal name and signature paper to the registrar when F2F
    - Registrar completes the challenge after verifying the signature from paper

- **Reputation Challenge**
    - Send a message containing `challenge code` and `identy info` to the challenged email
    - Use challenged address to sign email content, challenger print signature on the paper
    - When the challenger participates in the `conference/workshop as a speaker offline`, challenger will show signature paper to the registrar when F2F
    - Registrar completes the challenge after verifying the signature from paper

> Complete the above steps to get the `KnowGood` judgement

## Other Judgement
If in the above judgement challenge, the challenged person has any attempt to defraud the Registrar, such as forging a phishing account, provide forged business license, etc. Once the fraud is confirmed by the Registrar, it will receive a `LowQuality` judgement.

All accounts judgement by Liebi Registrar are valid for 1 year, and need to be re-challenged after the expiration. If they are not re-challenged, they will be modified to `OutOfDate` judgement.

## Judgement Fee
```
Registrar Fee: 5 KSM (Default)
Online Challenge: 1 KSM/Challenge
Offline F2F Challenge: 3-5 KSM/Challenge
```

> Challenger can get a refund or provide an additional fee according to their needs

# Sign & Verify
- Generate Signature
    - Using https://polkadot.js.org/apps/#/toolbox/sign
    - Paste the JSON Content (including challenge code) received by email/pm/other into `sign the following data`
    - Click `sign message` to sign
    - Deliver the `signature` to the registrar for verification as described in the **Ways of Challenge**

- Verify Signature
    - Using https://polkadot.js.org/apps/#/toolbox/verify
    - Enter the challenger's KSM Address into `verify using address`
    - Paste the JSON Content (including Challenge Code) received by email/pm/other into `using the following data`
    - Fill `signature` into `the supplied signature`
    - If the result returns `success`, the verification is passed, and if it returns `failed`, the verification fails.

# Community & Partner
Based on years of community accumulation, Liebi has established a technical community of about 2,000 people. Among them are potential Validators, technical geeks, KOL and other high-quality accounts that need to be provided by judgement.

We will strictly review identity information such as Email, Legal name, Twitter, Riot, etc. Adhere to the concept of having signature characters to be trusted. At the same time, our team is mainly based in Shanghai, China. Shanghai is a city where the Chinese blockchain industry gathers, and there will be many opportunities to contact teams that require offline certification to give a KnowGood judgement.

# Contact us
Website: https://liebi.com

Email: hello@liebi.com

Liebi is a financial service provider that uses blockchain technology to offer safe and stable decentralized financial products to users globally. They have launched several products like Liebi pool and Liebi CPU lease. 

They offer online and offline challenges to verify the identity of users. The online challenges include email, social media, and website challenges, while the offline challenges are legal name and reputation challenges. 

If a user attempts to defraud the registrar, they will receive a LowQuality judgement. All accounts are valid for one year and must be re-challenged after expiration. 

Liebi charges a fee for their services, and users can get a refund or provide an additional fee according to their needs. 

Liebi has established a technical community of about 2,000 people, including potential Validators, technical geeks, KOL, and other high-quality accounts that need to be provided by judgement. 

To contact Liebi, visit their website or email them at hello@liebi.com.

Apply for a new Registrar proposal description

### The Kapex Parachain has been producing blocks since winning and parachain slot on Polkadot, but cannot be upgraded due to an error.

> [SRLabs](https://www.srlabs.de/) conducted a security audit on the Totem Kapex pallets and identified an issue with some illegal code that impacted the Transaction Payment pallet adapted by the team. Unfortunately the team won a slot on Polkadot before the audit could have been conducted and so the issue was not discovered until the audit completed. 

## Background
The standard Transaction Payment Pallet had been forked and adapted to record transaction fees into the accounting engine of the KAPEX Parachain. the original version of this code was changed by a new team developer to use a function reserved for off-chain workers instead of the original code but as the code compiled it was not spotted until the audit. It was thought that an upgrade would fix the issue.

## Upgrade failure
As the Transaction Payment Pallet is called during an upgrade to reserve funds (even though the actual upgrade is free of charge), the illegal code was unfortunately also called to record this reservation of fees causing an error, preventing the upgrade from taking place and therefore not allowing the parachain to be fixed.

**_In addition this also meant that the XCM security vulnerability discovered in late September also cannot be fixed either at this point._**

All attempts were made to try to fix this issue without having to go to the Council and Referendum process, with help provided with gratitude from the Kilt.io team and Parity team Bastian, Alejandro and Santiago.

The new [Manual Parachain Lock](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/5451) cannot fix our chain because [the unlocking mechanism does not allow for centrally controlled chains to unlock the parachain from the relaychain side](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/6196). 

The fix that worked was to apply a validation code substitution using `paras.forceSetCurrentCode()` executed on the relaychain once the parachain `chain spec` had been updated accordingly and applied to the collators in our test networks. This is the subject of this proposal.

## Testing the fix

- [X] Tested the fix (`paras.forceSetCurrentCode()`) on our [Relaychain development network](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Frelaychain.totem.live#/parachains) connected to the Lego development parachain.

- [X] Upgraded the Lego Parachain to version [`v1.2.0`](https://github.com/totem-tech/totem-parachains/tree/kapex-v1.2.0-audit-fix) 

- [X] Upgrade Lego to [`v1.3.0`](https://github.com/totem-tech/totem-parachains/tree/kapex-v1.3.0-polkadot-v0.9.28-alignment)

- [X] Tested the fix on the [Rococo chain](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Frococo-rpc.polkadot.io#/accounts) connected to our [Stagex](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fs-ui.kapex.network#/explorer) production staging parachain with the help of Parity devs.

- [X] Upgraded the Stagex Parachain to version `v1.2.0`

- [X] Then upgrade Stagex to `v1.3.0`

- [X] Upgraded [docker Stagex nodes](https://hub.docker.com/layers/totemlive/totem-parachain-collator/staging/images/sha256-bc6fe0e61a347e2f64150aa2fd739bb5e0b12b0702c1b8a4f7da262b39328897?context=explore) to run version `v1.3.0`

## Production preparation
- [X] Decide the block number for the transition in Kapex [chainspec](https://github.com/totem-tech/totem-parachains/blob/main/res/kapex/kapex-parachain-raw.json) - Block number `400000`

- [X] Apply the [new production validation code](https://github.com/totem-tech/totem-parachains/blob/main/res/parachain-code-substitution-wasm.wasm) to Kapex `chainspec`

- [X] Tag the code repo from the main branch in the repo as [`kapex-v1.1.0-codeSub`](https://github.com/totem-tech/totem-parachains/releases/tag/kapex-v1.1.0-codeSub)

- [X] Build a new [docker image](https://hub.docker.com/layers/totemlive/totem-parachain-collator/production/images/sha256-21857f3efd8496a57bd41646d728086173b622ac085f5204f48a015dd9e02310?context=explore) with the new Kapex `chainspec`.

- [X] Restart the Kapex Collators with the new `chainspec`.

- [X] Transfer funds to request code Substitution on Polkadot

- [X] Create Preimage hash on Polkadot `0x1ca2532cbb04d421f1b216f354354524feffd8540e7ca74b0938e58d2cdfc923` 

- [X] Create a proposal

- [X] Create Preimage on Polkadot

We are unfortunately unable to distribute our funds from the Crowdloan until this issue is fixed, so we look forward to the community supporting this proposal through the referendum as soon as possible. Thanks in advance.

The Totem Kapex Team

- The Kapex Parachain is a blockchain that has been producing blocks since winning a slot on Polkadot.
- A security audit was conducted by SRLabs and an issue with illegal code was identified.
- The error prevented the parachain from being upgraded and fixing the XCM security vulnerability.
- The team found a fix by applying a validation code substitution and tested it on various networks.
- The Kapex team is preparing for production by deciding on a block number for the transition and applying the new production validation code.

Kapex Parachain - Validation Code Substitution to fix broken upgrade mechanism and permit XCM Security Vulnerability upgrade.

Untitled - public proposal #16

This is a proposal whose proposer address (12BJTP99gUerdvBhPobiTvrWwRaj1i5eFHN9qx51JWgrBtmv) is shown in on-chain info below. Only this user can edit this description and the title. If you own this account, login and tell us more about your proposal.

Redspot v0.1, applied by Patract Labs

This content (and title) can be edited by the proposal author to explain the rationale behind the proposal.

On chain democracy proposal

Hello. My name is Jonathan Kleiman. I am a Polkadot ambassador candidate, and I have been a lawyer in Toronto for 10 years. I am licensed by the Law Society of Ontario. You can find my website at www.jkleiman.com, and you can peruse my google reviews [here](https://g.page/kleimanlaw?share). 

As a lawyer, I am licensed to verify documents as a notary. My intention is to verify legal name identities on-chain using this same process. Specifically, I will require two pieces of photo ID, and a short video call to confirm that the person seeking identification is indeed the person on the ID's provided. 

The video call (no, a screenshot - see edit) will be recorded for verification records, but will not be shared without requestor's consent or a court order, if for some reason the requestor needs to prove that their identity was properly verified.

As a lawyer, the risk to me of publicly confirming somebody's identity incorrectly is very serious, as the public would be assured of the reliability of such verification and would be able to rely upon it as if it were notarized by me. For this reason, verifications performed by me will be completely trustworthy, without question.

I plan to charge 5 DOT (3 DOT, see edit) for the verification services. Any voters for this proposal when it reaches referendum will receive their verification for free by fee refund once the proposal is approved (unless this is disallowed)

Please feel free to send any questions or suggestions to me at [Jonathan@JKleiman.com](mailto:jonathan@jkleiman.com)

[Proof of License](https://lso.ca/public-resources/finding-a-lawyer-or-paralegal/directory-search/members/lawyer/049/jonathan-louis-kleiman)

EDITS: 

1) I am lowering the price to 3 DOT, given the recent and anticipated price appreciation

2) Pursuant to comments, I suggest that no video be recorded, but that a screenshot of the video be taken and held on offline storage.

3) I will offer to verify email, twitter, and element name as well.

4) Non-english identification can be done, but must involve a lawyer licensed to practice in the jurisdiction that the account holder resides, who can certify the identity for the Registrar.

5) In the event that there are too many for one person to handle, additional lawyers can be involved to verify identities, but the main registrar would still be responsible to ensure the process is secure and reliable. This practice is acceptable to my law society as well - I am allowed to rely on the certification of a person's identity as long as it is done by a lawyer in their jurisdiction, and I am able to confirm the lawyer's identity and their license to practice law, and receive ID of the account holder.

6) Thank you to those who have participated in the discussion, and those who have foregone staking rewards by seconding my proposal.


Jonathan Kleiman is a lawyer who wants to verify people's identities on the blockchain. He will require two pieces of photo ID and a video call to confirm the person's identity. The video call will be recorded for verification records, but will not be shared without the requestor's consent or a court order. Jonathan plans to charge 3 DOT for the verification services. He will offer to verify email, Twitter, and Element name as well.

Lawyer to Verify Legal Names

Hi Council,

My name is Marvin Tong, founder of Phala Network which implements Confidential Smart Contract with a TEE-Blockchain Hybrid Architecture based on Substrate and Polkadot. 

Not only our team is working as Subtrate builders, I'm also a volunteer in Polkadot groups in China. This is why I want to contribute Judgement service for KUSAMA identity, I will provide good service for Identity judge for Chinese group using KUSAMA!

Because of my goal is not building a new way for registrars, but to help and share more work from a single person, so I will follow the authentication process designed and implemented by Chevdor as: https://www.chevdor.com/post/2020-01-registrar1/.


If the basic environment of this application is not yet mature, please ask the committee to reject my idea. For me, this is just a volunteer intention. 

Thank you!

1. Marvin Tong is the founder of Phala Network, which uses a special technology to keep things private.
2. He is also a volunteer in Polkadot groups in China.
3. Marvin wants to help with the KUSAMA identity program by being an Identity judge for the Chinese group.
4. He will follow a process designed by Chevdor to do this.
5. Marvin is doing this as a volunteer and will only do it if the application is ready.

Democracy Public Proposals