Requested DOT: 1,000,000 DOT ๐ฎโโ๏ธ๐จ๐
tl;dr: Check out this clip from a recent episode of AAG where I discuss what Incentive Pools are.
Greetings Polkadot community
Iโm Agyle and Iโm a serial entrepreneur, business operator, and the co-founder of Talisman. In my career so far I have been accumulated both significant financial rewards and scar tissue as Iโve built organisations, dealt with customers, hired or fired over 50 people, and done my best to empower and incentivise teams to do the best work of their lives. I wrote this proposal in an attempt to address what in my opinion are addressable incentives problems with current practices around treasury funding, specifically when funding the most loyal and credible teams in the Polkadot ecosystem.
This proposal has multiple aspects to it, and I hope the community will offer thoughtful critique on each of them:
What are Incentive Pools?
Incentive Pools novel concept that aims to enable the treasury to deliver superior results for tokenholders by shifting the definition of success for treasury proposals away from the completion of tasks outlined in the proposal itself, to the accumulation of on-chain actions that are attributable to the work of teams participating in the Incentive Pool.
How do Incentive Pools work?
Incentive Pools work similarly to commission-based salary packages that are typically offered to sales people. They provide a stream of cash flow that can be deployed with minimal oversight to pay for operational expenses, enabling teams to take risks and work autonomously toward the accumulation of attributable on-chain actions. They also offer participants the largest benefits for successfully generating results, as well as the ability for pool curators to cancel the pool, ending the cashflow after a notice period and clawing funds back.
๐ย Please read the full proposal hereย ๐
Long live the Paraverse! ๐ซก