BURN DOT or DEAD (excessive inflation)

Central Argument:

Continuous DOT inflation, designed to incentivize network security, has diluted the token's value over the years, negatively impacting investors and market sentiment. To restore confidence and ensure Polkadot's long-term sustainability, it is crucial to balance security with token scarcity. We propose a strategic burn of 30% of the circulating supply to achieve this goal.

1-Proposal Justification:

Combats Dilution and Value Loss: Polkadot's current design, with a constant 10% annual inflation rate, benefits validators who stake, but penalizes token holders who do not. A significant token burn would reverse this trend, creating a scarcity shock and sending a clear signal to the market that the community is committed to protecting the asset's value.

Incentive Alignment: Token burning would align the interests of validators and nominators with those of all investors and developers in the ecosystem. A more valuable token attracts more capital and talent, strengthening the network's security and long-term growth.

Market Positioning: By permanently reducing supply, Polkadot would differentiate itself from other networks with purely inflationary models. This action could position DOT as a deflationary asset, a factor highly valued by investors.

Catalytic Effect for the Ecosystem: A token revaluation could act as a catalyst, attracting more capital and projects to build on parachains. A strong token price is an indicator of the network's health and vitality, making it more attractive for investment.

Frequently Asked Questions:

Would this affect security? The burn would be executed in a way that does not jeopardize the network's operation. Stability would be maintained by ensuring that the remaining circulating supply is sufficient for the protocol's governance and operations.

Is this a viable percentage? A 30% burn is a symbolic and drastic percentage to generate a significant impact, but the final percentage should be determined by thorough technical analysis so as not to affect network liquidity.

Conclusion:

Adopting a burn mechanism, starting with a bold measure like the one proposed, would not only address inflation concerns but also revitalize Polkadot's economy. We believe decisive action is necessary for DOT to position itself as a leading asset in the crypto space, rewarding both network security and the loyalty of its holders. We support this proposal.

2-. Burning 20% of the DOT supply to combat inflation

Reasons and objectives:

• Supply reduction: Burning a significant portion (20%) of DOT decreases the total circulating supply, which can help counteract inflation and increase scarcity.
• Price stabilization: A reduced supply, assuming demand remains steady or increases, can lead to price appreciation, helping stabilize or boost the token's value amidst inflationary pressures.
• Market confidence: Active token burning demonstrates proactive monetary policy, signaling to the community and investors that the project is committed to maintaining token value and long-term sustainability.

Implications:

• Liquidity impact: Burning tokens reduces available liquidity, which might increase short-term volatility.
• Community perception: This move can be viewed positively by holders, as it potentially enhances the value of their holdings and encourages long-term retention.

2. Burning 10% to incentivize holders with over 3 years

Reasons and objectives:

• Long-term holder loyalty: Targeted burning rewards investors who have held DOT for over 3 years, fostering loyalty and reducing the likelihood of early sell-offs.
• Recognition of commitment: It acts as an incentive for long-term commitment, encouraging holders to remain invested and engaged.
• Project stability: By incentivizing long-term holders, the project aims to build a stable core community that supports sustained growth and resilience.

Implications:

• Increased engagement: This can strengthen the bond with long-term investors, promoting a committed and stable community.
• Perception of favoritism: Some might see this as preferential treatment, so transparent communication about the purpose and benefits is essential.

Overall summary:

These measures aim to reduce inflation through token burns, potentially increasing the token’s value, while simultaneously fostering a loyal community of long-term holders. It’s important to weigh the benefits against potential liquidity impacts and market perceptions, ensuring clear communication to maintain trust.