It seems like this bounty doesn't have neither proactive activity nor reactive activity as there are no child bounties granted.
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/62
This bounty was meant to be reactive to provide for legal support and other technical efforts but in 8 months it's had no activity. We would like to hear if there are parties interested in the funds of this bounty because as of now all active legal efforts don't depend on it as they are working in parallel and with more specific goals as well as more specific projects often, in house or directly hired. Otherwise, we'd like to hear if there are grounds for closing this bounty due to inactivity and lack of impact.
Moreover, now bounties are required to provide a timeline for depletion of funds, plans for funding among other things, something this bounty doesn't comply with.
A poll is included on this discussion, Voting AYE means closing the bounty NAY, means leaving it active but more than anything, we would like to hear the reasons why this bounty should or shouldn't be closed.
Let's kickstart the discussion.