Sorry but this makes no sense. There's absolutely no correlation between being good/net positive and being anon. I can think of dozens of non doxxed agents, in many ecosystems, that are net positive. 0xTaylor is an obvious one in Polkadot, samczsun,  zachxbt, banteg are well known others. 

I am in favour of this proposal. Maybe not necessarily for bounty curators, but definitely for HAs. I am well aware that a lot of value has been created by pseudonymous accounts in this space (Satoshi Nakamoto for one), But the position of HA to publicly represent Polkadot necessitates a real world identity. I for one have tied by real name to my HA application from day one. https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/861 

I am sure that this WFC will get a lot of pushback from members of ChaosDAO, as they thrive on anonymity, and secrecy. As said, there is plenty to do for annons in the crypto space, but being and HA (the public face of Polkadot) is not one of them. 

As a quick reminder, of the current HAs Leemo and DonDiegoSanchez are pseudonyms who consistently refuse to disclose their real names. 

If there were a formal "constitution" of the network, this would definitely be unconstitutional.

Correction - DonDiego Sanchez did disclose his real name in his initial HA Application. My apologies. For Leemo however I think still nobody knows his name. In any case, KYC on HAs is definitely a good idea. 

@lv I think you missed the point here. We don't wanna KYC everyone on the Polkadot network. Just the ones who want to get elected to a representative, well-paid position. I don't think it's too much to ask for them to disclose their real name. 

This wish for change proposal is very simple, introduce a KYC/DID system for:

-   HA
-   Ambassadors of all ranks
-   Curators of all current and future bounties.

OpenGov is evolving and clashes with many disputes, by introducing this system we could discourage bad actors and favor people who really want to change things and actively work to grow our ecosystem.

Not being a Dev I leave them the suggestions of how a possible integration could work.

#Edited 🔽

_**For clarity**, I used the term 'KYC' informally (not in the traditional sense). To ensure a robust security solution, we should leverage the existing tools available through Kilt DID. This would be sufficient to maintain a high level of security until a potential Polkadot citizenship system will be fully operational._

This proposal suggests introducing a KYC/DID system for HA, Ambassadors, and Curators to discourage bad actors and encourage active participation in growing the ecosystem. The idea is to use Kilt DID for security until a Polkadot citizenship system is fully operational.

remark

TimedOut

Submitted

wish_for_change

Inroduce KYC/DID for HA and Bounty Curators

root

whitelisted_caller

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.