Threshold
As we are into numbers, let's have a look ref 900 - HA proposal for Georgi_PS
42 ayes votes - 99% of aye votes is 1 single address from giottodf: 15QupQzf9Gir1b4cGpt5Nc3JuRo645vkTeLm1XJNszBz9r2h
Such a legit voice to talk about community support 👍
There may be another option for holding "re-elections" without removing all HA but until that comes to light this seems to be the best way forward.
After removing it is important to fund the collective so that in elections going forward there is a RISK on tokenholders to vote anyone in (the risk of losing 10k per month) and there is a RISK on elected HA to lose their monthly payment.
The mistake was electing HA before these incentives and risks were in place.
The referenda 487 passed with 32.6M DOT Aye, which is one of the lowest in the history of the root track.
At least 68% (22.12M DOT) of aye votes are giottodf known addresses (see below).
How on earth can you shamelessly state that "community has been broadly supportive of the programme"?
The community just didn't want to vote because it was ridiculously unprepared and led by hatred of the original ambassador program, here is the fact.
15QupQzf9Gir1b4cGpt5Nc3JuRo645vkTeLm1XJNszBz9r2h - 6.94M
1649c4indT6Dr3W2yVGZeEsTPpqgzAq67VMdQbsYRCTz8qyv - 6.68M
13NyeyHnRUoYww2Xs9sHzVMRatC2PsqvbAgbm8J8aLj4ZCtg - 4.5M
1wpTXaBGoyLNTDF9bosbJS3zh8V8D2ta7JKacveCkuCm7s6 - 4M