Proposal: Setting a 5% Minimum Validator Commission Fee for Polkadot
With the enactment of the governance proposal to reduce Polkadot's inflation rate to 120 million DOT per year and the recent increase in the validator set size from 297 to 500, we believe we should consider setting a minimum validator commission fee for Polkadot. This proposal aims to ensure the sustainability of smaller validator operators, maintain decentralization, and meet the growing hardware and operational requirements as Polkadot scales.
Motivation
Validator profitability has been significantly impacted by:
The average validator currently earns significantly less than a year ago, while the costs of running a validator are increasing due to:
Higher hardware standards:
Database size:
Polkadot blockchain expands by over 500 MB daily, with a pruned database exceeding 500 GB (StakeWorld Database Size Analysis). This limits the capacity to run multiple validators on a single machine, with most hosting providers limiting storage capacity to mirrored 1tb NVME’s.
Revenue Decline:
A year ago, 1% commission earned ~13.8 DOT per era.
Currently, 1% commission earns ~6 DOT per era—a 56% reduction.
At the average commission rate of 3.6% (excluding private 100% commission validators), a validator earns 21.6 DOT per era ($125.28 at $5.8/DOT) compared to 49.68 DOT per era ($288.14) previously.
These dynamics create unsustainable conditions for smaller operators, discouraging new entrants and increasing reliance on large staking providers.
Proposal
Introduce a Minimum Commission Fee of 5% for Polkadot Validators.
This aligns with Kusama’s existing practice, ensuring validator operators can cover operational expenses and reinvest in hardware and infrastructure while preserving network decentralization.
Benefits of a Minimum Commission Fee
Decentralization:
Economic Sustainability:
Parity with Kusama:
Security and Performance:
Proposal: 5% Minimum Validator Commission Fee for Polkadot
Proposal: Setting a 5% Minimum Validator Commission Fee for Polkadot
With the enactment of the governance proposal to reduce Polkadot's inflation rate to 120 million DOT per year and the recent increase in the validator set size from 297 to 500, we believe we should consider setting a minimum validator commission fee for Polkadot. This proposal aims to ensure the sustainability of smaller validator operators, maintain decentralization, and meet the growing hardware and operational requirements as Polkadot scales.
Motivation
Validator profitability has been significantly impacted by:
The average validator currently earns significantly less than a year ago, while the costs of running a validator are increasing due to:
Higher hardware standards:
Database size:
Polkadot blockchain expands by over 500 MB daily, with a pruned database exceeding 500 GB (StakeWorld Database Size Analysis). This limits the capacity to run multiple validators on a single machine, with most hosting providers limiting storage capacity to mirrored 1tb NVME’s.
Revenue Decline:
A year ago, 1% commission earned ~13.8 DOT per era.
Currently, 1% commission earns ~6 DOT per era—a 56% reduction.
At the average commission rate of 3.6% (excluding private 100% commission validators), a validator earns 21.6 DOT per era ($125.28 at $5.8/DOT) compared to 49.68 DOT per era ($288.14) previously.
These dynamics create unsustainable conditions for smaller operators, discouraging new entrants and increasing reliance on large staking providers.
Proposal
Introduce a Minimum Commission Fee of 5% for Polkadot Validators.
This aligns with Kusama’s existing practice, ensuring validator operators can cover operational expenses and reinvest in hardware and infrastructure while preserving network decentralization.
Benefits of a Minimum Commission Fee
Decentralization:
Economic Sustainability:
Parity with Kusama:
Security and Performance: