Threshold
This should probably be proposed on the whitelisted track to gather fellowship approval and keep the root track clear for emergency relay runtime upgrades.
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1326
The tx looks real.
The hacker accuse you of stealing 2M+ DOT.
Although I do not think you are innocent,
I will say Aye for this proposal (If choosing two thieves, I will prefer the one with KYC, at least I know who I am against).
1-- You should bring back explorer back
In the thread you say "subscan" is too expensive, in discord you say it is technical issue.
You are losing users' trust. If you really do everything correct, you will try your best to help investigating, bring back online the explorer.
Even if the high cost of service was your initial reason to offline the explorer, it is no longer now.
It is a necessary money you should spend to buy everyone's trust.
2-- NA
(Updated, I just saw Parallel Finance sending a medium link. A good sign. But again, not good enough, the solution is also bad)
Based on https://parallelfinance.medium.com/rebuilding-after-the-parachain-attack-a-message-to-our-community-9dccd6c2a080 sent by Parallel team, many issues sent by hacker has been asnwered (I do not want to say if the answer is good or not)
Unless the team officially rug pull, I still hope that we will get money back.
There is fine line between misuse or steal. You have big name investors. They will concern it too.
I will prefer the side with KYC. Let vote Aye for this proposal first.
Edited
In the Parallel Team's telegram, it was communicated that the application user's CDOT remaining which are not redeemed was also stolen by the hacker and the user who lost there funds will not be returned but in the summary nothing is mentioned about CDOT loss, Can the team clarify?.. How do you trust the team whether they will return the user fund or not. Also in the Telegram and discord , user who lost there funds are blocked from questioning..
Team is saying that the actual hack happened in November but the application was not allowing to withdraw for a long time, when the user questioned , they were told that it is because of a technical glitch, they were telling that the funds were safe but all of a sudden they came up with this hack story. This story has to be investigated. This hack cannot happen without the knowledge of the team. How careless is the team. Parallel team is not eligible to handle user funds.
Parallel team should return all the funds Users lost. Polkadot community should come together to get justice for the users who lost the fund because of Parallel.
Parallel team was never transparent with the user, We should make sure that the parallel team is not doing this for their benefit.
We truly appreciate the community for casting their votes in the referenda. We’d like to take this moment to express our gratitude and wish everyone a wonderful end to the year.
As we move closer to regaining sudo control, we want to provide another perspective on voting: consider the consequences of NOT passing this referendum:
In addition, while some members have expressed concerns about whether this is the most optimal approach, we are eager to collaborate and listen to the community. If there are ways we can improve, please guide us and share your feedback.
In closing, your participation is crucial for the future of our community. Together, we can ensure a more secure and prosperous environment for all. Thank you for your continued support!
Solution proposed by the team doesn't address all affected parties, what about the users who hold their CDOT in your platform, you are not returning their CDOT but instead you are going to give 1000 PARA for each user CDOT you lost, and you are saying you are doing this in good Will - Seriously????, How this is goodwill, make me understand. When the parachain lease expired the corresponding project team returned all the DOT's to your platform, what happened to those, those belongs to the user and not teams. How can you say that if user have not redeemed DOT's from you application then the USER'S DOT belongs to Parallel Team.. This is ridiculous..
Thank you for this well-crafted proposal and it’s an Aye from me. I’m reassured to see the team collaborating with law enforcement and security firms to recover the stolen funds. That said, could you provide more details on your specific plans to retrieve the funds still held in the hacker’s wallet?