Polkadot + Brave Wallet: Driving Adoption Through Native Integration

Treasurer
17d ago
21 Comments
Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
3MUSDC
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
0
Tally
0.1%Aye
99.9%Nay
Aye
19.35KDOT
Nay
20.15MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.00%
26.86KDOT
Issuance
1.53BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Does it only work on Brave Browser? Does it have a mobile version?

Reply
Up

I do like the idea of having Brave setting up the "webchannels" into the polkadot ecosystem, wonder about how sustainable this is with the degree of change we are facing today in the network. The user base already knows about privacy and security and with that 1/2 the battle is won, Now do we have what it takes in the ecosystem to device a social interaction tool that uses the ecosystem datafeeds? so we can absorb the user base!

Reply
Up

The maintenance cost is unclear to me.

After the implementation, does it require additional cost to maintain the Polkadot integration or not?
I mean, will it be supported by the Treasury or Brave team ?

Thx in advance.

Reply
Up 1

Total Requested: $3,000,000 USDT/USDC

  1. The amount is unbelievable.
  2. Not all parachains are included, and only 3 of them. Lol.
  3. Additional costs for future upgrades and maintenance are not included.

Thank you for such a generous proposal, but we clear nay here.

Reply
Up 1

Is anyone receiving a finder's fee, commission, kick back or any other form of compensation for helping you with this proposal?

Reply
Up

Quite concerned about this proposal.
Nor were any of my questions answered.
I can see the same situation with Saxemberg's questions as well.
Bad.

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Treasurer track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received one aye and six nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The majority of voters expressed opposition to the proposal, citing concerns about its alignment with the ecosystem's needs and the high cost of $3 million. They emphasized issues like usability over marketing and suggested that any wallet integration should naturally occur rather than be financially incentivized. While a single voter saw potential benefits in accessing a large user base, most felt that the proposal lacked clear milestones for measuring success and treated it as an excessive marketing expense with uncertain returns.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up