Threshold
From my recent experience providing technical support through this bounty to external teams building on the Polkadot stack, I have seen its practical value.
The support process typically operates on a monthly cycle:
I am currently working with one such team and have been actively engaged for several weeks now. Given this ongoing engagement and the structure in place, I believe this bounty serves an essential function in supporting teams navigating technical integrations.
Closing it prematurely could limit valuable technical assistance for teams that rely on this structured support system. Instead, it may be worth considering ways to improve its visibility and efficiency to maximize its impact.
Edited
I could only share the notion board for the execution plan for OpenFundNet
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Treasurer track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received nine aye and zero nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
Most voters supported the closure of the inactive bounty due to its low activity and lack of utilization. Several comments highlighted that the bounty had not been functioning effectively, indicating a consensus on its ineffectiveness. While one voter chose to abstain due to their role as a curator, they generally backed the idea of rebooting similar initiatives in the future. Overall, the feedback reflected a clear agreement on the need to discontinue the unused bounty.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Treasurer track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received nine aye and zero nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The voters overwhelmingly supported closing the bounty due to its inactivity, noting that it had experienced minimal usage and lacked any significant demand. Several voters, including those from the curator board, confirmed that the bounty did not function effectively and recommended its closure. Though one voter chose to abstain, they expressed a general preference for rebooting similar initiatives in the future. Overall, the consensus highlighted the necessity of addressing inactive bounties for better resource allocation.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Comments posted here