Retroactive Small Tips for Content (February)

15hm...VEiA
Small Tipper
9mos ago
6 Comments
Rejected
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
≈0DOT
Status
Decision7d
Confirmation10mins
Attempts
0
Tally
7.3%Aye
50.0%Threshold
92.7%Nay
Aye
≈2.08MDOT
Nay
≈26.35MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.04%)
≈610.21KDOT
Issuance
≈1.37BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
How OpenGov works↗
Call
Metadata
Timeline4
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments
15fT...yBzL

Hello @Pitcoin ,

I went through your content, and while reading I started thinking that the articles were lacking structure. Each article felt like being exposed to flashes of sentences and memey images rather than a well-structured article that streams information. Also, there are too many images in your articles. But then I noticed that the articles are actually just your X threads copied and pasted one after another.

Which brings me to, you state that you are asking for funds for 14 pieces of content, but in reality this is only 7 pieces of content, duplicated on X and Polkaverse.

Amount asked is not a lot, and I find effort valuable. but I don't find it integral that you're inflating your content count. Nay from me.

PS#1 If it was not about the integrity of the proposal, I would still think twice before granting ~250USD (200DOT * 9USD / 7) per each of your content.

PS#2 I find your efforts valuable, but you should work more on your content. There should be more to it than flashing tweets in a thread.

kukabi | Helikon

Edited

Reply
Up
15fT...yBzL

@Pitcoin please don't get discouraged, you're on the right path but in my humble opinion you need to work quite a lot more especially on your non-X content. Good luck!

Reply
Up
1gat...ME5J

Hello @Pitcoin !

Would you consider applying this request to the relevant bounty instead?..

Maybe Bounty 33: Marketing is a good fit for your operation?

Best regards!!

Milos

Reply
Up