Plaza name

Wish For Change
4 Comments
Deciding

Plaza should operate under the name and brand Polkadot and not have a separate name like plaza or any other name

Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation1d
Attempts
0
Tally
86.9%Aye
13.1%Nay
Aye
30.29MDOT
Nay
4.55MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.69%)
10.02MDOT
Issuance
1.45BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest

Having a system chain competing with Polkadot's customers (Moonbeam, Astar, Hydration, etc.) is a bad idea, in my opinion. It's just a workaround for the severe issues Polkadot has, such as poor UX. These issues have contributed to the mediocre success of DeFi-related parachains.

However, for the first time ever, I agree with Giotto. If we have a smart contract system chain, it should carry the name Polkadot, e.g., "Polkadot Smart Contract Chain" or something similar, not Plaza. The Polkadot brand should be immediately recognizable, and its success should be immediately attributed to DOT.

Reply
Up