This tip is for Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM which follows this template:
Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage
Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence
Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal
Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc
Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?
Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only
Tips for DOT Experts are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.
Background:
Hector did work on Trappist which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.
Proposal #379: NFT XCM aims to make XCM NFT Interoperability production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.
Ready to help OpenGov voters make informed political decisions?
Join the DOT Experts Telegram Group
Threshold
If Giotto thinks Hector should receive tip for helping him to vote (even so he didn't even vote on REF#379) he should tip him himself.... Stop acting as DOT Treasury is your bags.