DOT Experts Tip for Hector Bulgarini for Proposal #379: NFT XCM

This tip is for Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM which follows this template:

Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage
Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence
Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal
Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc
Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?
Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only

Tips for DOT Experts are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.

Background:

Hector did work on Trappist which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.
Proposal #379: NFT XCM aims to make XCM NFT Interoperability production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Request for DOT Experts!

Ready to help OpenGov voters make informed political decisions?

Join the DOT Experts Telegram Group

The document is about Hector Bulgarini's analysis of Proposal #379, which focuses on making NFTs work better across different platforms in the Polkadot ecosystem.
It explains why the proposal is important for people deciding whether to read more.
It describes how things currently work without this proposal.
It imagines what the future will look like if the proposal isn't adopted.
The context shows how this proposal relates to other ongoing projects.
It discusses why this proposal is needed and its business importance.
It also looks at the trade-offs compared to other possible solutions.
Finally, there's a call for experts to help voters make informed decisions.

Source

This tip is for Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM which follows this template:

Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage
Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence
Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal
Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc
Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?
Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only

Background:

Hector did work on Trappist which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.
Proposal #379: NFT XCM aims to make XCM NFT Interoperability production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Request for DOT Experts!

Ready to help OpenGov voters make informed political decisions?

Join the DOT Experts Telegram Group