Referendum #260
Treasury #516

6 months Educational Campaign in India - Crypto India

Treasury
11mos ago
15 Comments
Awarded
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
  • Metadata
  • Timeline2
Comments

At Polkadot Philosophy, we have thoughtfully considered the proposal. While we recognize the potential of this initiative, especially in a market as vast and dynamic as India, we find ourselves compelled to cast a 'Nay' vote at this time. Our decision is grounded in a few key concerns that we believe are crucial for the success and sustainability of such an endeavor.

The Rationale for Our Decision:

The substantial financial allocation requested – approximately $115,800 – necessitates a more robust justification regarding expected outcomes and impact. The current proposal does not sufficiently outline the direct benefits or return on investment this sizable budget will bring to the Polkadot ecosystem.

A significant gap in the proposal is the lack of a detailed plan for measuring and evaluating the campaign's impact. Without specific metrics and targets, assessing the campaign's effectiveness and justifying the investment becomes challenging.

The proposal does not adequately differentiate its content and approach from existing educational resources in the blockchain space. This overlap raises questions about the unique value and necessity of the proposed campaign.

Recommendations for Future Proposals:

Detailed Budget Breakdown and ROI Analysis: Future proposals should include a thorough breakdown of budget allocations alongside a clear analysis of the expected return on investment.

Comprehensive Impact Assessment Framework: Proposals must incorporate specific, measurable goals and a solid plan for tracking progress and evaluating success.

Unique Value Proposition: It is essential to clearly articulate how a new initiative differs from and complements existing resources, ensuring that it fills an unmet need within the community.

In summary, while we see the potential and the need for enhanced blockchain education in India, our decision to vote 'Nay' is based on the current proposal's lack of detailed financial justification, clear impact measurement strategies, and a distinctive approach. We remain open to revisiting our stance should these aspects be addressed in a revised proposal, aligning more closely with the strategic and fiscal prudence that the Polkadot community values.

Reply
Up