The ink! smart contract programming language is becoming increasingly popular among developers within the Polkadot community for its simplified syntax and efficient deployment, utilizing the contracts pallet. Previous audits in 2022 and 2023 commissioned by Parity Technologies and executed by SRLabs have focused on auditing ink! 4.0 and the contracts pallet. Important to note that at the time of this previous audit, there was a limited number of real-life contracts with complex logic utilizing ink!
This proposal enables a comprehensive audit of the ink! 5.0 smart contract language and implementation to identify new vulnerabilities and point out potential areas of improvement in its codebase. On top of the codebase changes since the latest review, the auditors will conduct a deep dive on the ink! storage layer and XCM integration. By joining forces with the Parity Security team to ensure that relevant real-life contracts and all major stakeholder expectations are considered, we will enhance the security and reliability of ink! smart contracts and ultimately contribute to the growth and adoption of this innovative programming language within the Polkadot ecosystem.
How can we improve our proposal? Which ink! contracts do you believe are most used in the ink! ecosystem that could benefit from our audit? Your input will help us refine our approach to better serve the Polkadot community. Thank you.
The ink! smart contract programming language is becoming increasingly popular among developers within the Polkadot community for its simplified syntax and efficient deployment, utilizing the contracts pallet. Previous audits in 2022 and 2023 commissioned by Parity Technologies and executed by SRLabs have focused on auditing ink! 4.0 and the contracts pallet. Important to note that at the time of this previous audit, there was a limited number of real-life contracts with complex logic utilizing ink!
This proposal enables a comprehensive audit of the ink! 5.0 smart contract language and implementation to identify new vulnerabilities and point out potential areas of improvement in its codebase. On top of the codebase changes since the latest review, the auditors will conduct a deep dive on the ink! storage layer and XCM integration. By joining forces with the Parity Security team to ensure that relevant real-life contracts and all major stakeholder expectations are considered, we will enhance the security and reliability of ink! smart contracts and ultimately contribute to the growth and adoption of this innovative programming language within the Polkadot ecosystem.
How can we improve our proposal? Which ink! contracts do you believe are most used in the ink! ecosystem that could benefit from our audit? Your input will help us refine our approach to better serve the Polkadot community. Thank you.
Threshold
Threshold