TL;DR
B2B customers such as startups and large enterprises will drive a huge portion of the next wave of Web3 adoption, and other ecosystems are already trying hard to get a slice of that pie.
Polkadot's technology is ideally suited for B2B applications, yet our research so far indicates that this market segment is much undervalued, and needs to become a much higher priority for us if we want to seize this significant market opportunity.
With that in mind, the main outcome of this proposal is B2B Marketing & Sales enablement, giving ecosystem teams the much needed strategic insights, tools, and guidelines they need to effectively close more deals and establish Polkadot as the leading Web3 platform for businesses.
Link to Full Proposal | Link to Discussion Forum Post | Link to Natalie's Linkedin & Personal Bio | Link to Jashar's Linkedin & Personal Bio Link | Link to AAG presentation
Hey everyone!
We’re excited to share our proposal with you today. This is the direct result of all the great conversations we’ve had with folks across the Polkadot ecosystem — before, during, and after Decoded 2024 in Brussels. We also want to express our gratitude to everyone who engaged with us during the pre-referendum proposal discussion and provided their feedback. Your input has been invaluable in refining this proposal and enhancing its future impact on the ecosystem.
We've also hosted a Q&A session during this year's Web3 Summit on August 20th in Berlin. We already presented on the Kusamarian's AAG series on August 22nd, but are planning to join another one to answer remaining questions. Please tune in if you want to learn more about our project.
Best, Natalie & Jashar
New players have entered the Web3 arena. Many more will follow. Yet, nobody is talking to them. The Web3 space is dominated by early groups of insiders: fans talking to fans.
What needs to happen is a perspective change. We need to put ourselves in the shoes of our new audiences. Non-tech talent looking for new careers, institutional investors seeking better returns, government bodies working on regulations, and B2B clients looking for new products, efficiency, or security. We need to understand their needs instead of teaching our technology; talk about solutions instead of feature lists; and speak their language. To do this right, we need Marketing and Sales to be specific, targeted, and differentiated. The new wave of audiences is more diverse, and a one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t work anymore.
At Decoded 2024 in Brussels we talked to many ecosystem stakeholders and key opinion leaders - including Business Development teams at Parity, Decentralized Voices from the DAO, various initiatives funded by the Decentralized Futures, and working groups by Head Ambassadors. Here is a summary of our most important findings:
Finding 1 - Untargeted Communication: The current "one-size-fits-all" strategy is full of technical jargon and ineffective for the diverse new audience. Particularly enterprises are not addressed in any communication.
Finding 2 - Dispersed Teams: Lack of centralization leads to inefficiencies, redundant efforts, and a lack of knowledge sharing, highlighting the need for better coordination.
Finding 3 - BD Representatives Left Alone: There are no marketing or business development resources available for the enterprise sector, leaving teams and individuals alone. This leads to inconsistent messaging and massive inefficiencies. A centralized repository like Distractive’s for end-users is needed to enable BD representatives to do their best job.
Finding 4 - Action without Strategy: Initiatives often lack a cohesive strategy, causing inefficiencies and missed opportunities for synergies.
Finding 5 - Efforts for the Short-Term: Emphasized by leaders, long-term strategic planning is essential for sustained growth and efficiency.
Finding 6 - Lack of Prioritization: Teams struggle to identify which leads, industries, or companies to focus on, resulting in broad-stroked efforts and the inability to recognize when to say no. Furthermore, enterprises require significant support and long conversion times, with representatives often wasting resources on unproductive leads.
Finding 7 - Decentralized Budget Allocation: Requires mechanisms for accountability and evidence-based decisions to ensure effective use of resources.
Finding 8 - Unstructured Processes and One-Off Efforts: Proposals lack evidence-based approaches and iterative processes. This results in hasty conclusions and missed opportunities for continuous improvement and learning. Advocates call for a proper Request for Comments (RfC) process in OpenGov to ensure that the best solution is chosen based on data.
While the findings cover a wide spectrum — from short-term actionable tasks and execution needs to long-term strategic planning and enablement — one overarching conclusion is clear: there is an urgent call for action and a need for improvement.
We recognize that not everything can be solved with a single, all-encompassing and long-term proposal. Instead, we need to break down this big challenge into smaller, manageable parts and address each one step by step.
If our goal is to onboard more B2B clients to build on Polkadot, the journey to get there should include the following six steps:
Important to note:
Let’s dive into the specifics. What does all of this mean for Polkadot? How does our work fit into existing initiatives? Where do we begin? And most importantly, how can we effectively attract more B2B clients to build on Polkadot?
The key to our work is “enablement”. Projects with functioning sales enablement achieve 10-30% improved sales metrics, such as brand awareness; number and / or quality of leads; larger deal sizes; higher click, conversion, win, and retention rates; shorter sales cycles; higher customer satisfaction and lifetime value [CSO Insights, Forrester, Aberdeen Research, Gartner, McKinsey 2024, McKinsey 2022, Salesforce]
The following graph will help clarify these points and, as a result of our initial research, highlight the individual deliverables’ benefit in the short term, as well as the gap to existing resources.
How to read the above image: One of the key results of Phase 2 (Targeting) is the development of clear and useful Persona Profiles (see under Exemplary Deliverables). These Persona Profiles will show and explain the most attractive B2B segments for Polkadot. They will be very helpful right away, as the various ecosystem players can use them to start shifting their focus on the right B2B audiences (see under Short Term Impact). Right now, there aren’t many similar resources available within Polkadot, though, so there is a need for this deliverable to be produced by someone (see under Current Availability). Additionally, the nature of the work and its outcomes gradually shift from research-intense tasks and strategic thinking toward execution and operational activities, as illustrated by the two triangles to the right.
Some key takeaways and general remarks:
Overall, we recognize and appreciate the existing talent, creativity, and great energy within the Polkadot ecosystem, particularly in operations and execution. Meaningful work is already underway, so duplicating past efforts is unnecessary. The priority should therefore be to identify gaps and synergies in the first place, avoid creating yet another uncoordinated silo, and instead act as a facilitator and ally to Polkadot ecosystem players, providing them with strategies and tools for more effective B2B engagement.
We are in close contact with many of the key players at Parity, the Web3 Foundation, Decentralized Voices, Decentralized Futures, and Head Ambassadors. Our commitment is to engage long-term and collaborate with them at every step of the journey.
Aligned with the findings from above, this proposal focuses on the initial three phases of the journey: Market Segmentation, Target Market Selection, and Positioning Strategy Development. Below is an outline of these phases, including objectives, action items, and deliverables for each phase.
To make sure we provide clear insights into the nature of this project and what you can expect from us, we’ve included conceptual background information, additional details, as well as illustrative output examples in our full proposal document for your convenience.
Phase 1: B2B Market Segmentation | 4 Weeks
Phase 2: B2B Target Market Selection | 5 Weeks
Phase 3: B2B Positioning Strategy Development | 5 Weeks
The outcomes of our project are expected to drive significant improvements in key performance indicators, including generating better-qualified leads, reducing sales cycles, increasing win rates, and securing larger deal sizes. Additionally, our approach is designed to enhance customer satisfaction and lifetime value, while fostering synergies across the ecosystem that will amplify overall impact.
Together, these phases provide a structured approach to enhancing Polkadot’s market presence, improving targeting precision, and developing a robust positioning strategy to maximize impact and drive B2B success in the Web3 space. Notably, the value generated extends beyond the project’s completion; each phase delivers actionable insights and tools that teams can leverage immediately, integrating them into their strategic planning and daily operations to drive ongoing value and effectiveness.
This project is divided into three phases, each with clearly defined objectives, activities, deliverables, and milestones. It will take an estimated 14 weeks to complete at a cost of $181,000. This budget includes our day rates, as well as additional project costs including administrative expenses, T&E, research and marketing. With our extensive experience from similar projects, we have a solid grasp of the budget and timeline needed to deliver this project. As such, we will not require additional funding (top-ups) mid-project. Below is a more detailed cost breakdown per phase:
Updates and status reports will be provided to the wider Polkadot ecosystem at intervals yet to be determined, but no less than once a month. This approach aims to keep things honest, committed, and transparent within the community while allowing everyone to build trust with us over time. A more detailed overview can be found here.
The project will be carried out by So So Scaled!, an initiative founded by Dr. Natalie Tillack and Jashar Seyfi during EthCC 2024 in Brussels.
To successfully cross the chasm from tech enthusiasts to mainstream market adoption, we bring together the best of both worlds: Web3 native experience plus more than 30 years of combined senior-level expertise across a spectrum of impactful positions. Our journey includes pivotal roles in Marketing and Sales enablement, from advising at top management consulting firms like McKinsey to contributing at global advertising agencies such as BBDO. We've also served as co-founders and executive managers at startups - from early-stage ventures to unicorns like Lime - and held senior positions within the Polkadot ecosystem, such as at Parity. Furthermore, we've had the privilege of sharing insights as guest lecturers at leading institutions like Harvard Business School, MIT, and Oxford. A more detailed overview of our initiative as well as our personal bios can be found here.
Additionally, we have a broad global network that includes businesses such as early-stage startups and large enterprises, private and institutional investors like VCs and family offices, lawmakers including government entities and regulatory bodies, and influential thought leaders and key decision-makers in the Web3 space. We will leverage these connections to ensure the highest quality of work.
So So Scaled! is committed to being deeply involved in future projects that will focus on go-to-market strategy, iteration, and roll-out (see steps 4 to 6 of our outlined solution that are not part of this proposal). We have the skills and expertise essential to their success and we are excited to collaborate closely with the ecosystem teams, ensuring our strategies resonate with target markets and drive adoption. Image II in this document highlights some of the key deliverables anticipated during these phases and offers a preview of how potential follow-up projects might look like. Regardless of who leads these initiatives, we are ready to contribute our knowledge to make sure they exceed expectations.
We believe that by focusing on the B2B segment, we can create a significant positive impact on the Polkadot ecosystem. Polkadot is a perfect fit for B2B customers, and by adopting a more strategic and differentiated approach to marketing and sales, we can bridge the gap between Polkadot’s current offerings and the needs of various companies. We are in this for the long term and are thrilled to become a crucial player in the Polkadot ecosystem, helping shape its future success.
Q: Why are you asking for USDC instead of DOT? A: We aim to keep things simple and transparent. With our extensive experience from similar projects, we have a solid grasp of the budget and timeline needed to deliver this project. As such, we will not require additional funding (top-ups) mid-project. To mitigate the risks associated with price volatility and allow us to focus exclusively on delivering results, we’ve opted to use stablecoins.
Q: Is your work not going to overlap too much with existing initiatives within the ecosystem, such as Distractive or PoKe? A: We highly value the talent, innovation, and momentum within the Polkadot ecosystem. There are already many significant contributions, and duplication would indeed be counterproductive. Our approach therefore centers on identifying gaps and creating synergies. We see ourselves as collaborators and facilitators, offering strategic groundwork, insights, guidelines and tools to enhance B2B engagement. We maintain active dialogue with key ecosystem stakeholders — including Parity, the Web3 Foundation, Decentralized Voices, Decentralized Futures, and Head Ambassadors — to ensure our work aligns with the ecosystem’s needs and delivers meaningful value.
Q: Is Natalie still working at Parity, and if yes, is there not a conflict of interest with her current role? A: Yes, Natalie remains with Parity and will continue to do so throughout this project. Her connection with Parity and other ecosystem participants is a significant advantage, especially during the phases of initial research, stakeholder mapping, as well as training and onboarding. She will support this project and is planning to gradually transition into a full-time role at So So Scaled! following the successful completion and potential continuation of this initiative. This has already been fully coordinated with Parity.
Q: Why is this project not funded through the BD Bounty? A: The BD Bounty is a commendable initiative that we fully support. It plays a vital role in attracting new projects and developers to Polkadot, which is crucial for ecosystem growth. However, our project takes a more strategic focus, complementing rather than fitting into the Bounty’s objectives. We look forward to collaborating with the BD Bounty in the future to maximize the impact of our efforts across the ecosystem.
Threshold
What are your users? Enterprises or other organizations serving enterprises?
If it's a company, which regions' companies? Why do companies need polkadot, what practical benefits can it bring to them, and is it attractive to them?
What have you learned about your users and what are the KPIs for your proposal?
I have met Jashar and Nathalie at Web3Summit in Berlin. They have participated in our meeting for BD and then we followed up with discovering these topics during their workshop. I believe they are very capable of executing this and will be a great addition to the BD efforts that are happening on Polkadot currently.
There are some parachains appchains within the ecosystem that are establishing long-term cooperation with enterprises, which raises suspicion of duplication of work. Have you gained some understanding of this? Can you elaborate on it?