Referendum #1099

Top-up request for Reactive DOT and related works

Medium Spender
29d ago
12 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
37,314USDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
1
Tally
66.9%Aye
54.5%Threshold
33.1%Nay
Aye
56.28MDOT
Nay
27.9MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(1.20%)
17.68MDOT
Issuance
1.47BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest

There's currently a bug on Subsquare that prevents HTML tables from being rendered correctly. Kindly refer to this link for the same proposal on Polkassembly as a temporary workaround 🙏.

Reply
Up

I understand the sentiment against top-ups. I really do. However, I really think that this case is different than most, at least in the sense that Tien has never profited from the DOT going up, and because when he submitted the proposals the option of requesting stables wasn't there. Also, as @Victor Oliva pointed out @tien is doing an incredible job, so far.

Reply
Up 1