This is a High-Level strategy for Marketing, a plan of action and processes for a curator set. There is No defined Curator list in this strategy, Nor a request for Funds at this time. As a Product Strategist I am concerned that we are putting much needed funds into Marketing without a clear path forward.
My belief is we have good people that want to do right by Polkadot, however things have not been working and many are upset, including myself. This is a jump off point to hopefully unite and create a community to make Polkadot an unstoppable force globally by marketing strategically and with purpose to reach outside of our bubble.
In my old career my original company (before an acquisition), bought a commercial spot at the “super bowl” (American football) to express direct to consumers what we did for them. This commercial was called “Hearding the Cats.” This concept commercial is famous and, in many memes still today.
With Polkadot we are in a remarkably similar place, however one size does not fit all to get our message out. I would like the community to consider the following:
“Know Your Audience: Marketing Buckets:
All five buckets need to run in parallel of each other outside of just organic reach. There is no single target to focus on, all five are needed to win adoption!
When bringing breakthrough products to market, or even developing them, we need to think “outside the box” if we are looking to grab the attention of those who do not understand the technical nuances. Example: when delivering Apple Pay, tokenization was not advertised to the masses. Even now when I talk to RWA folks some did not know that Tokenization was introduced with Apple Pay.
Please comprehend that some, not all results are an overnight thing, but a momentum. When momentum fails, you pivot, when momentum raises you add more gas. This is determined by metrics of your singular outreach promotions.
Rules of Strategy:
Marketing Visionary Idea Concept Working Group
I understand WagMedia is an organic internal working group, we also have the DOTS, both teams put out good work. However, this concept is for Visionaries and pairing them with the talented artis in our Polkadot Family to create advertisements.
This is a HUGE issue for Polkadot currently, and one of the reasons we’re fragmented. In a traditional company, one of the strengths is the ability to tap into resources needed to produce work. The Polkadot community is filled with talented artists, in all forms, from images, video production, jingle writers and music choreographers.
I believe many of our Devs have ideas, and either do not have the time, or do not know the resources that will bring their idea to life, with high quality. Devs are best suited to attract other Devs, so this is an experiment area of the strategy. However, anyone with a great idea should be able to apply.
This creative structure can have the ability to change the game for Polkadot and foster more of a community effort to attract the people and Developers we desire.
I am a proud member of this community and want to see us thrive and attract others in the world to use and create on this amazing technology for Web3. Let us build a decentralized future together with a strategy that our community is aware of and can get behind!
Threshold
Example: when delivering Apple Pay, tokenization was not advertised to the masses. Even now when I talk to RWA folks some did not know that Tokenization was introduced with Apple Pay.
I'm sorry but this is absolutely not correct. Apple Pay tokenization means that your credit card number is never shared with the merchant to make a transaction. A token is instead created using the credit card number as part of the seed which can be verified by the PCI processor. THIS IS WILDLY DIFFERENT FROM RWA TOKENIZATION. Please stop telling people this... And this concept wasn't introduced with Apple Pay, this concept was introduced with the creation of EMV chips which have been around since the 90's.
Hi Hope,
Is it a discussion?
If yes, what not starting a discussion rather than a SmallSpender ref ?
I get the point of the discussion, but I don't get the form under a SmallSpender ref here.
Thx in advance for the explanation on using this specific track.