Threshold
While I too have concerns with pricing, I do see benefits to the ecosystem from it. Added that this is the third tranch of payment my overall thoughts lend towards an aye.
Edited
Hey Eiger team,
We at Parity think this is a great proposal. We need storage solutions in Polkadot. However, before we can aye this proposal we would like to discuss some things with you. First, we would want to have some technical conversations to understand what exactly you are building and how it will work in the future. Secondly, we would like to discuss future maintenance of the network, what it will cost and who will do this. We can have a meeting directly in the near year, please send a mail to bastian at parity dot io and then we can setup a call :)
Thank you,
Basti
Dear @Eiger,
Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is NAY.
The Big Spender track requires a 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received one aye and three nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion, along with individual members' votes and comments, can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO