Polkadot Storage: Phase 3/3

Big Spender
1mo ago
10 Comments
Confirming
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
1.9MUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
1
Tally
51.2%Aye
48.8%Nay
Aye
49.41MDOT
Nay
47.04MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.78%)
11.89MDOT
Issuance
1.52BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline4
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Dear @Eiger,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Big Spender track requires a 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received one aye and three nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The proposal received mixed feedback, with one supporter reluctantly voting in favour to honour the commitment made by the approval of earlier milestones. Critics primarily raised concerns about the high cost, questioning whether nearly $2 million was justified for the proposed effort. Some also felt the proposal was premature, given that JAM is not yet ready, and expressed concerns about future maintenance costs. While the potential need for decentralised storage solutions was acknowledged, scepticism about the timing and expense dominated the discussion.

The full discussion, along with individual members' votes and comments, can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,

Permanence DAO

Reply
Up

While I too have concerns with pricing, I do see benefits to the ecosystem from it. Added that this is the third tranch of payment my overall thoughts lend towards an aye.

Edited

Reply
Up

Hey Eiger team,
We at Parity think this is a great proposal. We need storage solutions in Polkadot. However, before we can aye this proposal we would like to discuss some things with you. First, we would want to have some technical conversations to understand what exactly you are building and how it will work in the future. Secondly, we would like to discuss future maintenance of the network, what it will cost and who will do this. We can have a meeting directly in the near year, please send a mail to bastian at parity dot io and then we can setup a call :)

Thank you,
Basti

Reply
Up