Technical & Marketing Partnership - Polkadot & Team Vitality to revolutionize esports fan engagement thanks to Web3!

Big Spender
1mo ago
12 Comments
Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
1.86MUSDC
1.86MUSDC
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
0
Tally
0%Aye
100%Nay
Aye
9.39KDOT
Nay
43.89MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.00%
9.24KDOT
Issuance
1.53BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Hi and thx for your proposal.
We already have the on-going deal with HEROIC in e-sports.

1 deal at a time is enough for such sponsorship.
Personal NAY.

Please retry when the HEROIC deal is over.

Reply
Up

Lucky Friday have voted NAY. Please consider this a temporary notification after our vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx

Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Head of Protocol Partnerships “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.

Reply
Up

Dear @Team Vitality,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received one aye and eight nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum faced overwhelming opposition, with members criticising the proposal for its high cost, lack of transparency, and limited justification for sponsoring a second esports team alongside Heroic. Concerns included vague deliverables, poorly itemised expenses, and an unproven partner requesting a 2-year commitment without a smaller pilot project. Some highlighted limited on-chain engagement metrics from the V.Hive app, arguing they did not demonstrate significant adoption potential. While one member supported the proposal for its strategic concept, the majority viewed it as risky, poorly scoped, and unnecessary for Polkadot’s ecosystem.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up

3.7M $....
Easy money? Nope.

Reply
Up