Polkadot Community Foundation: Allow the Marketing Bounty to Execute Formal Contracts through the Polkadot Community Foundation

Wish For Change
8d ago
7 Comments
Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation1d
Attempts
0
Tally
99.9%Aye
0.1%Nay
Aye
37.51MDOT
Nay
30.36KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.59%
9.1MDOT
Issuance
1.53BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

There was no discussion about this referendum so many things remain a big question.
The main one is this:
Will this legal account (article 3 paragraph 4) be funded from the already existing Marketing Bounty budget or will the funds come from the treasury? All these costs should be covered by the Marketing Bounty funds and no increase of budgets or new referenda looking to cover these funds should happen.

EDIT 1: Based on this answer,
https://x.com/alice_und_bob/status/1887540571859775665
it is our interpretation that the marketing bounty will be open to seek new funds through a new referendum to cover this legal fund. Please confirm if this is the actual plan. The question is not only a matter of size/evaluation of costs but also of the source of these funds so please a direct answer about HOW this legal costs are going to be covered and if the treasury as the source is the actual plan.

Edited

Reply
Up 1

Hi there!
I voted aye because I believe that this is a good initiative.
However, I would like to highlight that the approved referendum on Polkadot is not the guarantee that the Polkadot Foundation will execute the wish of the Polkadot Community.

It`s also unclear if there is any time limit for the execution of ANY Polkadot DAO willing by the Polkadot Foundation, and in case of NOT Execution, what is the next action or inaction and what penalties should be applied.

Edited

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Wish For Change track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received eight aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed strong support for incorporating the PCF as a legal partner for on-chain entities, viewing it as a positive and progressive step towards enhancing the ecosystem. They emphasized the importance of legal support for marketing bounties and suggested that the necessary funding could be managed through existing bounties, avoiding reliance on the treasury. Overall, the comments reflected a consensus that this initiative would help professionalize the ecosystem and foster sensible collaboration amidst the prevailing chaos.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up