Referendum #1502

Reimbursement for corrupted staking ledgers

Small Spender
24d ago
4 Comments
Executed
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
1.6KDOT
587.11DOT
1.31KDOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation2d
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
50.0%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye
37.43MDOT
Nay
1.1DOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.61%
9.38MDOT
Issuance
1.55BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters overwhelmingly supported the referendum, expressing a consensus that assistance for individuals needing help with their accounts due to a faulty upgrade was essential. Many believed that these accounts deserved to be rewarded with staking rewards. The proposal received validation from discussions in the forum, and there were no objections raised against it. Overall, the comments reflected a strong agreement on the necessity and fairness of the proposed measures.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up

I can confirm that the above bug was indeed something that happened, Parity/Fellowship has been busy cleaning up all the leftover pieces of it for around a year now. Since we have a precedence of reimbursing any loss of funds that happens due to core protocol bugs (and NO USER ACTION), I think this is a fair ask, ergo a yes from my side.

Reply
Up