Google Drive Document Integrity and Certification System for Secure Proposals

Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
35,000USDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation2d
Attempts
0
Tally
0.6%Aye
99.4%Nay
Aye
350DOT
Nay
54.4KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.00%
12.52KDOT
Issuance
1.56BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Hi @Open 4 Blockchain,

I agree that it's necessary that the proposers include the PDF files and their hashes in the proposal, but it is basically free to do it on IPFS, and both myself and some others have already been applying this practice in our proposals. You are proposing to charge the treasury for interfacing with free services, and on top of that you're planning to charge the community further for the use of the services:

To access the API, users will be required to transfer DOT tokens to a smart contract, which will divide the transfer into two parts: one portion for the Polkadot network and another for the certification distributor to cover the service costs.

Totally unnecessary. Any proposer can already do it for free. It's just a matter of enforcement by the community. If we want to include it in the workflows of Subsquare or Polkassembly, then those teams should be funded to implement this feature.

Nay.

Best,
kukabi | Helikon

Edited

Reply
Up