Kick-start Campaign for RISC-V Smart Home Devices, Secured by Polkadot

9hrs 47mins ago
26
Confirming
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
150KUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
4d
Attempts
2
Tally
56.2%Aye
43.8%Nay
Aye
15.83MDOT
Nay
12.36MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.34%
5.34MDOT
Issuance
1.57BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Quick question guys (i love what you from the beginning, long time supporter, i've just bought the air quality censor by the way):
Did you contact the Marketing Bounty before posting on OpenGov?

It seems that it would fit perfectly with the MB.

Reply
Up 1

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and four nay votes from ten available members, with two members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum elicited mixed responses from voters regarding the proposal for funding a web3 project. Some expressed support, highlighting the potential for innovation and community backing, while others raised concerns about the project's alignment with the common good and the effectiveness of its marketing strategy. Critics pointed out issues such as unrealistic cost-per-click assumptions, the necessity of using third-party agencies, and an outdated influencer approach. A few voters abstained, citing uncertainty about the proposal's benefits to the Polkadot ecosystem. Overall, opinions varied significantly.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

PolkaWorld is voting NAY on this proposal.

  1. Based on the information provided, Polkadot’s role appears to be limited to the fact that these smart home devices run on the Robonomics Rollup, which itself operates on Polkadot Cloud. If the only connection is the use of Polkadot Core infrastructure, we don’t believe such proposals should be funded by the Polkadot Treasury. By that logic, a project like Mythical Games could also request Treasury funding simply because games like Pudgy Penguins or FIFA run on its rollup (Mythos), which is built on Polkadot — and because they generate high transaction volume. That doesn’t seem like a fair or sustainable approach.
    (If we misunderstood any technical aspect here, we welcome clarification and would appreciate a clearer explanation of how this integration fundamentally relates to Polkadot.)

  2. Even if the Treasury supports this proposal, it essentially acts as an investor. Therefore, it would be reasonable for a portion of the crowdfunding proceeds to be returned to the Treasury, as this is fundamentally a commercial launch effort.

  3. The budget request is vague and lacks sufficient detail. For example:

  • The $45,000 allocated for the creative team — how long is this intended to cover work for the five team members?
  • The $60,000 for advertising: where exactly will this be spent? Which platforms, and what kind of ads
  • Regarding influencer collaboration, is there a list of potential KOLs? It’s important that the community understands who these influencers are — especially considering prior concerns and “KOL drama” within the ecosystem.
Reply
Up