Milestone 1 - Accelerating Polkadot Adoption via Inter Miami CF Fan Engagement

Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
300KUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
4d
Attempts
0
Tally
0%Aye
100%Nay
Aye
11.81KDOT
Nay
39.33MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.00%
32.23KDOT
Issuance
1.57BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Hi,

2 quick questions:
1/ Could you remind us when the sponsorship ends with IMFC please?

2/ Is the app open-source? If yes, which components?

Thx in advance.

Edited

Reply
Up

PolkaWorld voted NAY.

The entire team opposed the proposal, based on the following points:

  1. The proposal does not explain how the app would collaborate with Inter Miami CF to channel fans into the app, raising doubts about the potential outcomes.
  2. The chosen educational content, points system, and check-in mechanisms might not align with the core interests and behavioral habits of football fans, leading to concerns about actual effectiveness.
  3. The budget is too simplistic; the $500,000 expenditure lacks detailed explanations and breakdowns.

For more detailed feedback, please visit here.

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received zero aye and six nay votes from ten available members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed significant skepticism regarding the proposed investment in Inter Miami CF, emphasizing the need for a clearer, structured plan that outlines long-term benefits and shared risks among stakeholders. Many criticized the lack of a cohesive strategy and requested validation of the project's potential before moving forward. There were calls for transparency about the financial implications for Inter Miami and the Polkadot ecosystem, with some voters advocating for a simpler, more focused initial approach to demonstrate value before seeking further funding.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

Truth DAO voted NAY.

🔹 Economically unjustified: A $500k investment in exchange for uncertain outcomes, with no built-in mechanism to guarantee ecosystem returns (e.g. minimum user thresholds or deliverables).

🔹 Lack of budget transparency: The proposal fails to provide a clear and detailed breakdown of how funds will be allocated.

🔹 Insufficient demand: There are already many similar or substitute applications available.

More feedback can be found here.

📖Truth DAO Governance Statement

💭 Email, Telegram

🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up