Epico: Ethereum Wallet Compatibility for Polkadot SDK Chains

Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
246.33KUSDC
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
4d
Attempts
0
Tally
47.3%Aye
52.7%Nay
Aye
17.79MDOT
Nay
19.85MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.23%
3.63MDOT
Issuance
1.57BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

OG Tracker Rating 3/3

Clear display of deliverables✅

  • Completion of Epico core features. Open-sourcing of the entire codebase.
  • Documentation, tutorials, and integration guides to streamline adoption by parachain and solo chain teams.
  • Fully functional demo with Epico integration and a demo UI for anyone to try it out.
  • Technical support/advisory for the first 3 months (after open sourcing) to any team who intends to integrate Epico in their chain.
  • Maintenance and update to latest Polkadot SDK quarterly releases for at least 6 months.

Clear display of a valid direct point of contact ✅

Clear display of proposal’s duration✅

  • The duration of this proposal is 12 months.

OGT Rating aims to help voters make better informed decisions and direct proposers towards certain common-good practices. We are providing feedback based on 3 simple yet crucial criteria which we believe should be included in every OpenGov referenda.

Edited

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten available members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The majority of voters expressed strong support for a proposal aimed at enhancing the connection between Polkadot and Ethereum, emphasizing its potential to attract Ethereum users to the community and the importance of building compatible tools. They highlighted the necessity of open-source code and compatibility with EVM wallets as crucial elements for broader adoption. However, one voter abstained, raising concerns about the project's timeline and costs associated with its production, suggesting a need for clearer proposals and market insights before proceeding.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

DISCLAIMER: Our Decentralized Voices delegation voted to abstain on this referendum in accordance with our conflict of interest policy, announced on the 27th of March, 2025.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

PolkaWorld voted NAY

Two-thirds opposed, one-third in favor.

Reasons for opposition:

While Ethereum compatibility is currently a higher priority, the budget section of the proposal appears overly vague, making it difficult to assess whether the requested amount is reasonable. We hope the team can further break down the budget into clear components: the number of developers (with role descriptions), the specific functionalities being developed, the development timeline, and the hourly rates.

Additionally, the proposal requests funding in USDC but mentions tax deductions. Since the funding is not provided in fiat currency, we suggest that the team further explain why tax deductions are involved and clarify the potential impact.

The supporting viewpoint highlights that the deliverables of this proposal are clear and concrete, with direct benefits to ecosystem user growth and clear empowerment for Polkadot SDK projects. Moreover, several projects (including Mythos, Frequency, and Polimec) have already expressed interest in integrating, demonstrating Epico’s strong compatibility and demand within the SDK ecosystem.

Check out the full feedback here!

Reply
Up

Hey @BlockDeep

Did you contact Parity and/or tech.fellowship about how this project could fit into the new Polkadot Hub strategy with PVM.

Just asking that because I don't want to double spend significant funds to projects which aiming EVM compatibility. Please clarify this.

Thank you!

Reply
Up

https://github.com/polkadot-evm/frontier
I wonder if you know anything about this open source project? You said those function points this project actually contains , such as Rpc, Gas conversion, transaction conversion etc. So what I'm worried about is that this program will be as troublesome as frontier for parachain compatibility, except for the EVM function.If you can do what you're talking about with very little code, I'll support you, otherwise you're just an abridged version of frontier. Looking forward to your reply 🙏

Reply
Up

Epico acts as a JSON-RPC proxy for Ethereum, translating standard MetaMask RPC calls (e.g., eth_sendTransaction, eth_getBalance) into native Substrate extrinsics on any Polkadot SDK chain—no EVM or PVM or plugins required. It’s the blockchain equivalent of using PyO3 to expose Rust in Python or the Python/C-API to load C code into Python right like a binding ?

Reply
Up