RegionX Hub – New Features & Improvements

5hrs 33mins ago
4
Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up 1
Share
Request
49,000USDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
2d
Attempts
0
Tally
100%Aye
0%Nay
Aye
24.53MDOT
Nay
101DOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.27%
4.27MDOT
Issuance
1.57BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

OG Tracker Rating 3/3

Clear display of deliverables✅

  • Urgent renewals
  • Auto renewals
  • User specific dashboards
  • Help centers
  • Other features & improvements

**Clear display of a valid direct point of contact ✅ **

Clear display of proposal’s duration✅

  • The duration of this proposal is 1.5 months.

OGT Rating aims to help voters make better informed decisions and direct proposers towards certain common-good practices. We are providing feedback based on 3 simple yet crucial criteria which we believe should be included in every OpenGov referenda.

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and one nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The majority of voters expressed support for the referendum, emphasizing the importance of enhancing user experience and educational aspects. They highlighted the need for new access methods, such as auto-renewals, which they deemed essential for improvement. Many viewed the proposal positively, believing it would benefit the ecosystem and enhance team performance. However, one voter opposed it, citing dissatisfaction with the quality of the product delivered, especially given the significant financial investment made to date.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

PolkaWorld votes AYE

Unanimous support from all members.

This proposal presents a well-thought-out UI design for Coretime, with user needs clearly segmented by type. The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and once launched, it is expected to significantly improve the experience of purchasing and interacting with Coretime.

Each feature in the proposal is clearly defined, and the breakdown of work hours and compensation is especially transparent—making the proposal easy to understand and evaluate. The requested budget is reasonable and offers strong value for money.

One of our members even mentioned this is her favorite proposal so far—because it greatly streamlined the review process!

You can view our full feedback here.

Reply
Up