Rebrand $DOT to $JAM in 2026

Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
1d
Attempts
0
Tally
76%Aye
24%Nay
Aye
1.66MDOT
Nay
523.87KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.03%
420.9KDOT
Issuance
1.58BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Very interesting proposal @Colorful Notion . I’ll need some time to digest everything this change represents fully.

However, first and foremost, I think it would be a shame to lose all the investment that has gone into marketing the Polkadot brand by switching to a drastically different name.

That said, you raise valid points about the new form of utility that JAM introduces. The “supercomputer” angle and quantum resistance narrative are likely to be strong themes for years to come, especially as Bitcoin and other chains will also need to adapt. This could give our ecosystem a critical edge.

Additionally, the logic behind the Polkadot name does feel increasingly outdated in the context of where the technology and ecosystem are heading. That said, I’m personally quite fond of the name Polkadot, and I imagine many in the community feel the same.

Nonetheless, this will be an interesting Wish for Change to follow.

Reply
Up

JAM is not the same thing as Polkadot. This request seems to be antithetical to the description of Polkadot and JAM as described in Gav's post here: https://forum.polkadot.network/t/introducing-a-new-jam-token/13029/43

Reply
Up 2

Polkadot needs a fresh narrative, and none fits better than JAM.

It’s the perfect chance to unite vision with momentum.

Reply
Up

As I’ve understood, JAM is a new protocol. In fact, I understand JAM is a protocol that is not blockchain specific, although it can have blockchains as services within it. On the other hand, Polkadot, as of today, is a blockchain network, a sharded one, that hosts parachains and provides a shared security via the relay chain.

As Gavin Wood mentioned in his recent comment on the forum:

[quote="gavofyork, post:43, topic:13029"]

Last year, the Polkadot stakeholders voted in favour of using the JAM protocol as part of a future technical upgrade path.

It is conceivable that other protocols and tokens may decide the same.

[/quote]

Based on this idea, and ref 682, it could happen that Polkadot’s relay chain is eventually replaced by the JAM protocol.

With these concepts in mind, after reading your proposal I am confused as to whether you are proposing to rebrand the DOT token (change token name to JAM) or the entire Polkadot network (name, blockchain, token, etc) to JAM? Or something else?

I found it confusing that sometimes you refer to “$DOT” and “$JAM”, are you referring to tokens? To a blockchain network? or to a protocol? I would appreciate it if you could please clarify this aspect.

Edited

Reply
Up