Cancelling Referenda 416, 428, and 443 in a batch

Content

AI Summary

This referendum is a proactive response to address issues identified on Kusama, implementing preventive measures until fixes are introduced.

The decision to cancel three technical proposals in a batch is necessitated by configuration errors that have been observed. Specifically, this batch call encompasses:

Referendum 416, which scheduled a runtime upgrade to the v1.1.0 release but included an XcmFeesToAccount fee manager compromising XCM execution, as reported here.
Additionally, Referendum 428, intended to update Sufficient Asset minimum balances, however, recommended rejecting in order to make a new one to go with the Asset Hub upgrade that actually updates the ED.
Lastly, Referendum 443, submitted as a fix to reduce the existential deposit to 0.01 DOT, combined the call from Referendum 428, aiming to update the minimum balances of sufficient assets.

Please feel free to also downvote those referenda. These actions are taken proactively to address identified errors on Kusama and will be revisited upon the introduction of appropriate fixes.

The Kusama referendum is a response to issues found on the platform. Three technical proposals are being canceled because of mistakes:

Referendum 416: A plan to update the system, but it had a problem with XCM execution.
Referendum 428: A plan to update minimum balances, but it needs to be rejected for a new update with the Asset Hub upgrade.
Referendum 443: A plan to reduce the minimum amount of DOT needed, but it combined with Referendum 428.

These actions are taken to fix errors on Kusama and will be looked at again when the right fixes are found.