Double dipping proposals and pillaging the Treasury... what is the point of the deposits to deter bad actors, when they can just cancel and re-submit the same proposal over and over (even when a previous proposal was passed and granted?!?) The Marketing Bounty was approved 2x and already has a REFILL for those bounties in the Decision Periods (approx $700k!!). The work that was used for the Marketing Bounties were all FUD, which you can see in the Lunar Strategy Invoice he submitted listing out KOLs that had rejected referendums  BD and Gaming both are proposed 2x.  How can this person be a Polkadot activist and representative when he is draining the treasury? 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JUybLGp50\_JqichzcGp79lY0JU18HdxVjn4yBxl122E/edit

bountyId

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

medium_spender

Approval of curators for Bounty 38 (Games bounty)

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.