Hello from Polkadotters,

I am not sure if this is for purpose, or if you did a poor competition analysis. Here are statements from your proposal:
"Currently Polkadot & Kusama have no native desktop wallet & web3 browser. As of today, the Polkadot & Kusama ecosystem has very basic mobile wallets and browser extensions, which provide limited features/services, lack a focus on providing a premium user experience, deliver basic user interfaces, and overall do not meet general user demands. They are not one-stop wallet solutions built for the masses, but rather app interfaces to interact with the chain built more for tech-savvy users and developers."
You probably pointing out the Polkadot JS wallet, but there are already a bunch of very good wallets in the space.
**Nova Wallet** - mobile wallet with dapp browser included, easy staking+governance access, HW support, NFTs...
**Talisman** - browser extension, which serves for Polkadot and also for Ethereum, having its own dashboard "portal", crowdloan support
**SubWallet** - dashboard + extension + mobile wallet all in one, dapps integration, staking, governance, crowdloan support
And some more wallets, which you can see in the comparison (from December 2023, so it might improved a bit)  ![comparison](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:4800/format:webp/1*1GkuH0K2jhl8BUgMkTAogg.jpeg)

While you don't focus on browser extensions, those are in our opinion the most preferable ones and those which fit the most to the Web3 space. For some other usecases, mobile wallets are the best solutions. Funding development of a stand-alone desktop hot wallet seems not to be reasonable in our eyes, considering the competition in the space with wallets above. And concerning what you have achieved till now, we are not sure if it will benefit the Polkadot ecosystem in some way or not. But if you implement Polkadot with your funding, you might have to measure the impact and then ask for funding retroactively. But for now, we vote NAY on this proposal.

We have decided to revoke this proposal, in order to submit a new proposal with changes incorporating feedback and discussions with delegates.

amount

beneficiary

Rejected

Submitted

DecisionStarted

DecisionDepositPlaced

medium_spender

Vote Nay

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.