Polkadot 2.0 Definition

Wish For Change
14 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 1
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation1d
Attempts
1
Tally
77.1%Aye
50.0%Threshold
22.9%Nay
Aye
69.23MDOT
Nay
20.56MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(1.41%)
20.11MDOT
Issuance
1.43BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest

Hey @Alice und Bob ,

I can appreciate the motivation behind this proposal. However, with reference to Colorful Notion's post, I also agree that Polkadot 2.0 seems bland. Keep trying, I'm sure something buzzworthy would manifest itself.

Reply
Up

Yeah right, let's let Gavin decide, because it's his chain and he's been running the marketing of Polkadot like a maestro this far 🙇🏽

Reply
Up

Yes pls. Especially new community members are often confused about what Polkadot 2.0 actually entails.
Maybe add BEEFY into the mix (the lightclient, not the memecoin ;) )

Suggestion:

Polkadot 2.0: Coretime, Async Backing, Elastic scaling, BEEFY
Polkadot 3.0: JAM & upcoming features that align with it (tbD)

Reply
Up

Few thoughts are coming up.

This whole process looks like a fucking joke from the outside. So Polkadot2.0 needs to be decided retroactively what's actually part of it? How did developers start working on these then

The whole issue stems from having no leader I guess.
Alice und Bob is suddenly an ecosystem planner, may we ask how you got this position?

  • What qualifications do you have to fill this role?
  • Do you even have web3 development experience? Because all I've seen on Twitter from you is mediocre web2 takes.

Seriously whenever Gavin will take responsibility for his actions this ecosytem will move further.
I mean this is like Apple asking the community what they think about the new phone features and how would they call. iPhone 8? iPhone7.5

Amateur hour, voting nay and bearish all things Polkadot until Alice und Bob is leading

Edited

Reply
Up

While the features outlined are indeed significant, I believe more work and broader community engagement are needed to define Polkadot 2.0's scope. Let’s continue to build on these ideas and aim for a version update that truly represents Polkadot's next major leap. Assigning the Polkadot 2.0 label based on including these three features feels a bit premature. While these features are significant, Polkadot 2.0 should represent a more comprehensive and transformative upgrade, reflecting a broader range of improvements and innovations across the entire ecosystem.

Reply
Up