Dotswap.org: Asset Hub DEX UI v1+v2 2024 Development+Hosting by MVP Workshop+Colorful Notion

Medium Spender
1mo ago
26 Comments
Rejected
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
0
Tally
36.2%Aye
50.0%Threshold
63.8%Nay
Aye
17.82MDOT
Nay
31.47MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.23%)
3.3MDOT
Issuance
1.46BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline4
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest

Hi,

I have some concerns regarding the viability and efficiency of this project.

I'm aware that there's already a fully functional AssetHub DEX: https://kheopswap.xyz/

And from what I can see, that project is already in a much better shape, future-proof by using Polkadot-API. Unlike Dotswap, which relies on Polkadot.js (Deprecated JSON-RPC) and a much bigger team/cost.

Reply
Up

Follow up on my concerns earlier, speaking of “OVERINVESTMENT”, you guys are asking a whopping +460,000 USD for a FE DApp. Of which imho already obsolete compared to Kheopswap (explanations in my previous comment), and Kheopswap is a side project built by one developer…

Reply
Up 1

This proposal is meant to be a continuation of the referendum 68 UI & Front-end for Asset Conversion pallet. It looks great and we expect to see it work in the future just as smoothly as today.

One question, will this exchange require continued funding through the treasury, and if so, how often?
We are seeing that this will split the payments for the work in two different versions of the exchange but we also see mentions of V3 and V4 as well as the imminent upgrade to Plaza and beyond. So can we have an idea of the future costs for the continued development and support of this exchange.

Moreover, the market is now rising, what will happen to the funds in case there is surplus in funding? (Proposal is currently quoted At 6.01$ per DOT)

We have voted AYE in the meantime but we will consider these important matters when future funding proposals come.

EDIT 1:
Given the answer, we will reevaluate V3 and V4 proposals heavily based on the future referendum funding request given that that it's "difficult to estimate future development costs" at the current time. We won't hesitate to NAY future proposals if we deem it too expensive. Another relevant factor will be the inclusion or lack of inclusion of an exchange token and the characteristics of it (i.e. tokenomics, distribution, unlocks, revenue distribution and so on).

Edited

Reply
Up

The teams have clearly put considerable effort into creating an intuitive and visually appealing interface that is easy to digest and navigate. The associated educational elements are often overlooked but are essential for onboarding new users and helping them navigate the platform.

We believe that improving the UX of dapps, protocols and products on Polkadot is important for the ecosystem's ability to acquire, engage and retain users. Overall, the proposal presents a step forward in creating more user-friendly experiences within the Polkadot ecosystem and hence we are voting in support.

Reply
Up