Referendum #483
Treasury #696

Polkassembly Social Contract 2024

Treasury
8mos ago
12 Comments
Awarded
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
  • Metadata
  • Timeline2
Comments

Though polkassembly and related governance tools are important to the ecosystem, this team is becoming more and more greedy. Their expenses are keep growing dramatically, but products UX/UI is just so so, not competitive.

Reply
Up

Hi @Polkassembly,

Although it's clear that Polkassembly plays a crucial role in OpenGov alongside Subsquare, I believe the budget requested is excessive. I don't understand why you should be charging extra for the new features when you already have a crowded personnel listed solely for maintenance. Furthermore, I'm noticing a trend of escalating costs with each proposal from Polkassembly, a point highlighted by ChaosDAO. Moreover, I don't understand why the treasury should be funding your travel and accommodation costs for the events.

My vote is nay, with the primary concern that Polkassembly's expenses are becoming increasingly heavy on the treasury. I would vote in favor of a proposal with a more modest and reasonable budget and a shorter duration.

Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon

Reply
Up