Referendum #483

Polkassembly Social Contract 2024

Big Spender
9mos ago
12 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
172.07KDOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
1
Tally
81.4%Aye
53.6%Threshold
18.6%Nay
Aye
59.62MDOT
Nay
13.62MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(1.25%)
17.19MDOT
Issuance
1.37BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments

Though polkassembly and related governance tools are important to the ecosystem, this team is becoming more and more greedy. Their expenses are keep growing dramatically, but products UX/UI is just so so, not competitive.

Reply
Up

Hi @Polkassembly,

Although it's clear that Polkassembly plays a crucial role in OpenGov alongside Subsquare, I believe the budget requested is excessive. I don't understand why you should be charging extra for the new features when you already have a crowded personnel listed solely for maintenance. Furthermore, I'm noticing a trend of escalating costs with each proposal from Polkassembly, a point highlighted by ChaosDAO. Moreover, I don't understand why the treasury should be funding your travel and accommodation costs for the events.

My vote is nay, with the primary concern that Polkassembly's expenses are becoming increasingly heavy on the treasury. I would vote in favor of a proposal with a more modest and reasonable budget and a shorter duration.

Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon

Reply
Up