Referendum #1169

Showcasing Polkadot’s Capabilities: The Spammening

Medium Spender
2mos ago
22 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
65,000DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
2
Tally
97.2%Aye
50.0%Threshold
2.8%Nay
Aye
16.98MDOT
Nay
497.79KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.42%)
6.2MDOT
Issuance
1.49BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline8
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments

A novel initiative. Very much interested to see the outcome of this experiment :)

Reply
Up 1

Where can we find the script that you plan to use?

Have you tried running this script on a local version of the Polkadot relay chain and shown that the blocks are being fully saturated?

There are some intricacies around making a high quality spamming script for Polkadot.

Furthermore, I would like to point out that transaction throughput on Polkadot is a really bad measure of how scalable it is. It is designed to process parachains, and there is a lot of "background work" happening on the Polkadot relay chain which take away from its ability to do basic balance transfers.

I think you will still find a good result (~1+K tps), I think it is much more of a signal to show how 10+ parachains with full blocks are being processed in parallel on the network.

Perhaps this proposal should focus on doing balance transfers, in parallel, on all Polkadot system chains.

Reply
Up

Shouldn't this be better suited to Kusama?

Even if that won't give us the exact result it should be quite similar to the "test in prod" scenario.

Reply
Up

I consider this test should be done in Kusama first.

Reply
Up

spam it with haste!

Reply
Up