[Retroactive Funding] JAM GrayPaper Reader

Small Spender
16d ago
4 Comments
Confirming
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
21,000USDC
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation2d
Attempts
1
Tally
99.9%Aye
0.1%Nay
Aye
37.6MDOT
Nay
19.81KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.60%
9.21MDOT
Issuance
1.53BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline4
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of all voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received seven aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The majority of voters supported the referendum, expressing positive sentiments about a widely used tool that aids implementation teams. They appreciated the retroactive funding request, viewing it as a valuable initiative that benefits developers involved in JAM projects. Comments highlighted the tool's effectiveness in fostering collaboration during discussions and noted that the pricing appeared reasonable. Overall, there was a strong consensus on the importance of supporting the proposal for this tool, reflecting its perceived utility in the JAM framework.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up