Referendum #1413
Treasury Spend #100

#100·[Retroactive Funding] JAM GrayPaper Reader

Treasury
7d ago
4 Comments
Paid
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
21,000USDC
Beneficiary
This spend has been paid. Check the beneficiary
Metadata
Timeline2
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of all voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received seven aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The majority of voters supported the referendum, expressing positive sentiments about a widely used tool that aids implementation teams. They appreciated the retroactive funding request, viewing it as a valuable initiative that benefits developers involved in JAM projects. Comments highlighted the tool's effectiveness in fostering collaboration during discussions and noted that the pricing appeared reasonable. Overall, there was a strong consensus on the importance of supporting the proposal for this tool, reflecting its perceived utility in the JAM framework.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up