Referendum: Community Building Fund for Bend-PVM - Attracting Developer Contributors to the PolkaVM Ecosystem (500 DOT)

TimedOut
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Tally
0%Aye
100.0%Threshold
100%Nay
Aye
3.91KDOT
Nay
34.73MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.00%
17.98KDOT
Issuance
1.57BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline2
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Big Tipper track requires 35% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received two aye and five nay votes from ten available members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Some voters expressed support, viewing it as an interesting initiative with potential benefits, while others raised concerns about compliance with established standards and the adequacy of funding for deliverables. Several voters abstained or voted against the proposal, citing issues such as a lack of transparency regarding bounty curators and incomplete decision deposits. Overall, the feedback highlighted significant skepticism about the project's viability and alignment with community expectations.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Edited

Reply
Up