Ambassador Fellowship Tooling: Personal Reimbursement Request

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Small Tipper track requires 30% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and six nay votes from ten available members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Some voters abstained or voted against the proposal, questioning the rationale behind covering software subscriptions for a compensated program head and expressing concerns about the lack of consultation with OpenGov. Others believed that reasonable compensation was justified. Overall, the discussion highlighted differing views on the appropriateness of funding certain expenses and the necessity of transparency in decision-making processes.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

PolkaWorld votes AYE

Regardless of how the Ambassador Program was run, we believe that these out-of-pocket expenses — especially for tooling — are eligible for reimbursement by the Treasury.

By the time of voting, this proposal had already passed. We’re leaving this comment here simply to share our perspective.

You can view the full feedback here.