Referendum #1657

Retroactive Tip for Assets-related Contributions to Polkadot SDK in the past 12 months

Executed
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
7.58KUSDT
Status
Decision7d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
65%Aye
50.0%Threshold
35%Nay
Aye
26.17MDOT
Nay
14.11MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.30%
4.7MDOT
Issuance
1.58BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Actions
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

hello @pandres95 ,

can you explain why the fellowship just cover a part of your total request? Thanks

Reply
Up

Hey Pablo,
I like the work you are doing. You are picking up a lot of things and deliver good work. I'm also fine with paying tips for these kind of work as it is done. However, I'm personally not a fan to come up later and requesting a tip based on some hourly rate for open source work. You have done this work as open source work and then requesting funding afterward feels weird. I would encourage you to go to the Rust OG bounty for example. There we can agree on the work and payment before and not trying to request it afterwards.

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Big Tipper track requires 35% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received four aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed unanimous support for the referendum, viewing it as a valuable contribution to enhance existing fellowship salaries. They believed that the proposed compensation was reasonable and justified, considering the significance and scope of the work involved. Overall, the comments reflected a consensus that supporting individual contributors through this initiative was a sensible and fair approach.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up 1

PolkaWorld votes AYE

PolkaWorld supports retroactive funding proposals — and this one is well-justified. The requested compensation of $50/hour is reasonable, and all the work has already been delivered and integrated. It’s a proposal worth supporting.

We are aligned in our assessment:
• The requested amount is fair and reflects the actual development workload and market standards.
• The relevant features have been completed and deployed, providing real utility.
• These improvements will enhance the user experience and asset usability on Asset Hub / Polkadot Hub, contributing to the growth of the ecosystem.

You can view the full feedback [here].

Reply
Up