Dear community,
This referendum seeks to adjust the invulnerable collator set of Polkadot Collectives.
The main objective is to make the invulnerable set better aligned with the risk profile and importance of the respective System Chain, while also keeping the assignment process efficient and consistent across the programme.
The curators also considered the historical assignment of slots across the System Chains. Where possible, the revised assignments favour operators with longer tenure and a demonstrated record of providing reliable service. At the same time, the changes are intended to help even the field for operators who have shown capability and interest in supporting additional System Chains.
Finally, this referendum adjusts the number of permissionless collator slots to ensure that permissionless collators do not outweigh the intended invulnerable set.
To support this, the curators applied a tiering model where each System Chain is categorised from Tier 1 to Tier 3, based on its perceived importance and risk profile. Under this model, Polkadot Collectives is categorised as a Tier-3 chain, with 2 funded community invulnerable collators.
For Polkadot Collectives, the proposed configuration is:
This referendum performs the following changes.
13C7Ssy9QNJk515SFezaKMfhMRFrRcZWBhXA3oDq1AuKVds51aQJTRwAjZCEDSCqwCHwuhpHtbtYkBNZ2Fui66nETJDkmGm1xtra1x2rXfWUxvFqscvUfjuDSx8AdEGhzADsYayZyicWsS13TUNfEBCi6xw5ZQgxYAwbCsALSuDfqDWMfbHigZNgncuV6v13ianMHbMJ3J1A7Ft769X2zXgppQzheRMRUFG7AQ77soJVk113xAUHVDyG1v9LLHYtMm7XZFyKNVxoj47oWV431XQ9kjXN3814T3MFxNa4d7pyjRAdKU6tLC8sfde1HBLGNMHKCMFqjWRrrMThere are also 2 developer-funded invulnerables already in place on Collectives. Those are not part of this community-funded rotation and are not being touched by this referendum.
13C7Ssy9QNJk515SFezaKMfhMRFrRcZWBhXA3oDq1AuKVds51aQJTRwAjZCEDSCqwCHwuhpHtbtYkBNZ2Fui66nETJDkmGmBest Regards,
Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io
Dear community,
This referendum seeks to adjust the invulnerable collator set of Polkadot Collectives.
The main objective is to make the invulnerable set better aligned with the risk profile and importance of the respective System Chain, while also keeping the assignment process efficient and consistent across the programme.
The curators also considered the historical assignment of slots across the System Chains. Where possible, the revised assignments favour operators with longer tenure and a demonstrated record of providing reliable service. At the same time, the changes are intended to help even the field for operators who have shown capability and interest in supporting additional System Chains.
Finally, this referendum adjusts the number of permissionless collator slots to ensure that permissionless collators do not outweigh the intended invulnerable set.
To support this, the curators applied a tiering model where each System Chain is categorised from Tier 1 to Tier 3, based on its perceived importance and risk profile. Under this model, Polkadot Collectives is categorised as a Tier-3 chain, with 2 funded community invulnerable collators.
For Polkadot Collectives, the proposed configuration is:
This referendum performs the following changes.
13C7Ssy9QNJk515SFezaKMfhMRFrRcZWBhXA3oDq1AuKVds51aQJTRwAjZCEDSCqwCHwuhpHtbtYkBNZ2Fui66nETJDkmGm1xtra1x2rXfWUxvFqscvUfjuDSx8AdEGhzADsYayZyicWsS13TUNfEBCi6xw5ZQgxYAwbCsALSuDfqDWMfbHigZNgncuV6v13ianMHbMJ3J1A7Ft769X2zXgppQzheRMRUFG7AQ77soJVk113xAUHVDyG1v9LLHYtMm7XZFyKNVxoj47oWV431XQ9kjXN3814T3MFxNa4d7pyjRAdKU6tLC8sfde1HBLGNMHKCMFqjWRrrMThere are also 2 developer-funded invulnerables already in place on Collectives. Those are not part of this community-funded rotation and are not being touched by this referendum.
13C7Ssy9QNJk515SFezaKMfhMRFrRcZWBhXA3oDq1AuKVds51aQJTRwAjZCEDSCqwCHwuhpHtbtYkBNZ2Fui66nETJDkmGmBest Regards,
Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io
Threshold
Threshold