Establishing an Insurance Bounty to increase fiscal efficiency of Polkadot treasury

Big Spender
13 Comments
Deciding
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
0
Tally
0%Aye
100%Nay
Aye
0DOT
Nay
18.84MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.00%)
5.83KDOT
Issuance
1.41BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
    New
Comments

Hello,

...while the move towards stablecoin transactions is promising, it is not yet a viable standalone solution for managing the financial needs of all projects due to the limited availability of these funds.

Then let's increase the availability of stable coin assets in the treasury.

It underscores the continued necessity for the Treasury Insurance Fund to manage the volatility associated with DOT and to ensure projects receive adequate funding regardless of market conditions.

No, it doesn't.

Additionally, it is important to consider the timing and strategic implications of transitioning significant treasury reserves into stablecoins, particularly at the onset of a market upturn.

Then please start an initiative for the community to consult on how to effectively manage asset diversity.

Nay.

Regards,
kukabi | Helikon

Reply
Up

there is the new spend() extrinsic to pay out in USDT. If proposers don't want uncertainty, this is what they should do. This bounty would just add complexity to a process that can be handled much simpler

Edited

Reply
Up 1