Removing Moonbeam from marketing narratives

Wish For Change
14 Comments
Deciding

Considering that soon we will have EVM on AssetHub with Plaza I believe we should remove moonbeam from marketing narratives as we only want to direct EVM activity towards Plaza as is in the best interest of DOT holders

(I already issued a separate referendum for removing astar from marketing narratives)

Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation1d
Attempts
0
Tally
60.8%Aye
39.2%Nay
Aye
28.93MDOT
Nay
18.67MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.67%)
9.69MDOT
Issuance
1.45BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest

I really don't know why we need to be going out of our way to knock, disparage and put down chains in our own ecosystem.

Ok so you clearly don't like Moonbeam. I'm sure they said something you didn't like, or failed to bend the knee to your will. But you really don't need to go out of your way to insult them and all the teams building on Moonbeam like this.

e.g. We gave 1M DOT to Stellaswap only a few months ago, so why would we not want to promote their EVM application?

Clearly this isn't a funding issue, as on yesterday AAG it was confirmed 180K USD was spent to put a polkadot Logo on a private plane.

I'm NAY on this one.

Regards,

OnlyDeFiGuy

Reply
Up

Moonbeam is the flagship Polkadot parachain. It's literally the gate for users outside of Polkadot to come in, and the safest bridge to transfer tokens among the parachains.

Moonbeam foundation remained reliable to the Polkadot ecosystem since day 1 and never tried to look for other narratives on different networks.

When Polkadot people want to praise Polkadot and how many transactions it secured in a given period - Moonbeam is there first to highlight it.

I have plenty of examples why to Nay this proposal, but I think the main idea is clear.

Edited

Reply
Up