Referendum #181
Treasury #463

Polkawatch, Decentralization Analytics, Continued Operation and Development

Treasury
1yr ago
12 Comments
Awarded
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
  • Metadata
  • Timeline2
Comments

First I would like to give our criteria by which we vote.

Our votes are based on the logic of "do I think that the amount given out is worth the benefit that this proposal will ultimately bring to polkadot ecosystem."

And according to your proposal, our answer is no.

I don’t see that Polkadot has decentralization problem that we need to solve here and now. In my opinion, everything is relatively good with our staking mechanism, and everything is much worse on the part of the applications that will attract users.

This may sound quite unpleasant, but in my opinion the ecosystem should focus on attracting real users to the applications, and discard everything else in this bear market and the low price of dot.

I also think that most nominators just want one "nominate" button and forget about it, just receiving rewards. And as I understand, some mobile wallets are working on such solutions.

Sorry for the fact that you probably would like to hear a different answer.

Reply
Up