On behalf of Trustless Core DV and as a consequence of the impossibility to issue feedback from that account, the corresponding feedback is presented:
"Dear Proposer,
Thank you for the proposal.
Trustless Core has decided to vote AYE for the following reasons:
Rectifying a Missed Payout: The Talisman team has proven that the payout from Ref. 1390 was never claimed due to a lapse in timeline tracking. This proposal provides a proper mechanism to correct that oversight.
Demonstrable Progress and Commitment: Talisman has clearly outlined that they have already progressed with the mobile app’s development, including finalized wireframes and various completed technology components. Their commitment to delivering a quality product appears genuine and well underway.
Transparency and Consistency: They have submitted evidence that the preimage was pulled, confirming the original payout did not occur. Additionally, the same Talisman-controlled multisig address will be used for the funds, ensuring consistency and accountability in handling the treasury.
Strengthening the Ecosystem: By supporting Talisman in completing their mobile application, we contribute to a broader, more user-friendly Polkadot ecosystem. Enhanced user experiences encourage wider adoption and strengthen the network as a whole.
Based on these points, Trustless Core believes the proposal is both reasonable and in the best interest of the Polkadot community. We appreciate Talisman’s transparency and look forward to the continued innovation they bring to the ecosystem."
https://x.com/trustlesscore/status/1916685298538537074
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received seven aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO