Hi Anaelle,
Thank you for your work.
The problem is that there is inaccurate information because you are entering the data manually. For example, the curators are receiving around $1,200 for Moderation Bounty instead of the $135 you mention, and the list of current curators is not updated. This is just one example, but there are more.
On the other hand, I have noticed that some members are participating in five bounties, which suggests a certain level of concentration.
Does anyone know why these curators charge such high amounts?
Community Events: $4,000 per month per curator
Polkadot Assurance Legion Bounty: $3,000 per month per curator.
Marketing Bounty: €3,925–€14,700 per month per curator.
It would also be interesting to know whether these curators keep the payments or sell them.
I support this TIP and the current work. Even working now fulltime since one year in this ecosystem, I often have to ask around for the right contact and search through OpenGov. Now the registry is now at my top bookmarks!
PS: I don't mind it's on Notion. But it would be good to leave comments.
PolkaWorld votes AYE.
Although the data is manually compiled by a single person, I still find it quite helpful—at least for me personally. It clearly shows which Bounties exist in the ecosystem, who the curators are, and what their compensation is. It also includes an overview of existing DevRel agents across the ecosystem. Overall, I believe this information provides value and is worth supporting with a tip!
You can view the full feedback here.
JAM Implementers DAO votes AYE on this proposal
This is a funding request for a structured record of treasury-funded DevRel teams and costs across the Polkadot ecosystem. The work is already done. It’s hosted on OpenGov HR, and the deliverable helps bring visibility and accountability to ecosystem spending—something the community sorely needs more of. While one of our DAO flagged the possibility of AI automating this and more in the future, that doesn’t diminish the value of the work already completed. A small, justified request with tangible output.
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Tipper track requires 35% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received three aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate
📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate
Edited