Referendum #1702
Treasury Spend #197

#197·Nova Wallet 7th Proposal: Retroactive Reimbursement: 1-Click Cross-Chain Swaps, Multisigs, Extended Ledger Support, Polkadot Vault v7.0 Support, Unified Address Format, Off-Ramps, Price Charts, DApp Browser Improvements, and more!

Treasury
2d 20hrs ago
13
Paid
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
980.37KUSDC
Beneficiary
This spend has been paid. Check the beneficiary
Metadata
Timeline2
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum (at least 4 aye votes) and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received two aye and three nay votes from eight available members, with three members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The comments reflected both support and concerns regarding the proposal. Some voters lauded the team and the product’s contribution to Polkadot’s ecosystem, emphasizing that Nova Wallet played a vital role in user growth. Others questioned the sustainability of retroactively funded, high-budget wallet proposals, pointing out excessive treasury spending and the lack of alternative, competitive funding models. Several expressed worries that continually high funding without prior community consultation might fuel an inflationary trend. While there was acknowledgement of Nova Wallet’s innovation and success, critics urged a more coordinated approach with structured evaluations to ensure that funding allocations align more closely with sustainable practices.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

TruthDAO vote: NAY

The proposed $130/hour rate exceeds our voting guideline of $100/hour. In addition, some members believe that, compared with wallets in the Ethereum ecosystem, all mature wallet tools in the Polkadot ecosystem should be self-sustaining and not rely on Treasury funding to continue product development.

See the full feedback here.

📖Truth DAO Governance Statement

💭 Email: open@truthdao.cn, Telegram

🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

Right now Saxemberg's scores for retroactive proposals are heavily penalized. This is done so that Opengov doesn't wake up to a 5-6 or 7 figure bill for work it didn't know was paying. Right now only wallets core efforts, Mimir, explorers and RPCs have a positive retroactive score.

Disclaimer:
Our modeling includes more than 1000 non-linguistic parameters so these are only verbal observations also included in the vote calculations and they are not an extensive review of the full rationale behind this vote.

Reply
Up

Although my vote on this proposal was cast prior to receiving my delegation as a DV Guardian from the Web3 Foundation and before the official announcement of Cohort 5, I am providing this rationale because the DOT delegated to me may have influenced the outcome of this proposal.

The Nova Wallet team has consistently demonstrated its ability to deliver a feature-rich, beautifully designed, and truly mobile-first wallet, a rarity in the Polkadot ecosystem. Their contribution is not just valuable but essential: they’re lowering the barrier to entry for new users and significantly improving the daily experience for existing ones.

Their work directly addresses one of Polkadot’s biggest challenges: making interactions with the network and its parachains intuitive, seamless, and competitive with leading wallets in other ecosystems. If Polkadot aims to onboard the next wave of users, tools like Nova Wallet are not optional, they’re foundational.

For these reasons, I fully support their continued development, and my vote is AYE.

Reply
Up