Referendum #1352
Treasury Spend #88

#88·Retroactive Funding for Ecosystem Activities

Treasury
10d ago
17 Comments
Paid
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
45,000USDt
Beneficiary
This spend has been paid. Check the beneficiary
Metadata
Timeline2
Comments

I implore everyone to read the report thoroughly. This is some of the most valuable ambassadorial work I've seen so far, with a clear focus on actions leading to real-world impact. A few standout points for me:

  • Represented Polkadot and created reference materials to guide curious newcomers.
  • Actively engaged on-the-ground with both current and potential builders. One of the few people I know doing this.
  • Not just focused on new leads, but also on understanding why teams left and how to retain them.
  • Initiated conversations that resulted in a CEX integration.
  • Always present, helping anyone and everyone for the betterment of Polkadot.
  • Consistently maintains composure and remains "politically correct", as an ambassador should.

We need less drama, and more of this!

Reply
Up

$100/hr tho?

you're asking for the equivalent of ~208,000/year salary when "the average Ambassador salary (globally) is $41,392 per year."

source: https://cryptojobslist.com/salaries/ambassador-salary

Reply
Up

My experience with William is that he is always thoughtful and deeply inquiring about the issues we have in Polkadot and works to find solutions that work holistically.

I have met him several times, and he was always focused on pushing Polkadot forward. AYE from my side

Reply
Up

Dear @W1ZSPR3,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires a >50% majority of the voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received six aye and zero nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum received unanimous support, with members praising William's dedication, credentials, and valuable contributions to the ecosystem. Members expressed strong approval for retroactive funding tied to clear deliverables and highlighted the importance of supporting William’s initiatives. Some suggested incorporating similar proposals into structured programs like the ambassador program in the future.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,

Permanence DAO

DISCLAIMER: This proposal was submitted by our member @W1ZSPR3, who abstained from voting on this referendum.

Reply
Up

William has been a fantastic ecosystem agent for a long time, and, as he states, not received any compensation for it. This in itself already stands in stark contrast to many other people who receive funding from multiple sources. His contributions have always been thoughtful, and made a positive impact. Yes, he could come up with a company name and then apply for DF or to a Bounty, but I appreciate the direct approach of asking the treasury for a contribution as an individual ecosystem agent. AYE!

Reply
Up