Delivery of 4 Government Use Cases to Onboard Millions onto Polkadot

Medium Spender
14d ago
14 Comments
Deciding
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
763KUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
0
Tally
18.1%Aye
81.9%Nay
Aye
1.43MDOT
Nay
6.45MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.07%)
1.08MDOT
Issuance
1.49BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments

I like Mandala chain and I hope they are super successful.
There is absolutely no reason the polkadot treasury should finance this, however.

Reply
Up 1

What does Mandala chain give in return for the financial support?
Mandala tokens?
A share of the expected revenue?

Reply
Up 1

Hi,
I agree with the previous answer.

If i understand the proposal, you are asking the Treasury to fund your chain, the Treasury would act as a VC.
So what does the Treasury get in return ?

So far, the Treasury is not a VC or a capital risk fund. We are not here to take 100% risks for what is not a common good for the network.
The proposal feels a bit:
"Polkadot pay, Mandala eventually makes profit".

But how do you share the return for Polkadot ? What is the ROI ?

Also, the end of the proposal could be understood as threats towards Polkadot:
"The potential costs of not funding Mandala Chain range from loss of influence in emerging markets, to slower user growth, and a setback in establishing Polkadot as a global leader in the Web3 space. Delaying support could allow others to fill the void, making it more challenging for Polkadot to penetrate these markets in the future."
-> What are you trying to say here ?
If we don't fund Mandala Chain, what happens ? You move to zkSync like Nodle ? You stop your project ?

Some parts of the proposal seems a bit clumsy.
Thx for clarifying your intentions in case you are NAYed.

Reply
Up

The proposers are answering great questions in KusDAO. Join with your discord account & then jump into the public Vote & Discord thread for Ref. 1210!

Reply
Up